Ataque como defesa? Táticas populistas contra a mídia para evitar a culpa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2024.27.4.7Palavras-chave:
Comunicação política populista de direita, evitação de culpa, estratégias discursivas defensivas antecipatórias e reativas, antielitismo, ataques contra a imprensaResumo
Neste artigo, explora-se a relação entre culpa e populismo, a partir da análise das estratégias de comunicação defensiva empregadas por líderes populistas de direita em seus ataques contra a mídia. O estudo se concentra em Jair Bolsonaro e conclui que o ex-presidente do Brasil fez uso de diferentes estratégias para fugir da responsabilidade por resultados negativos, enquanto culpava a mídia como um de seus alvos favoritos. O estudo exploratório baseia-se na análise qualitativa do discurso das narrativas presidenciais para esclarecer a natureza paradoxal dessas estratégias defensivas. Os resultados mostram que o estilo político de Bolsonaro envolvia a neutralização preventiva das críticas da mídia e a reação negativa a qualquer cobertura que contradissesse sua versão dos eventos e debilitasse sua autoridade.
Downloads
Referências
Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Reinemann, C., Stromback, J., & De Vreese, C. (Eds.). (2016). Populist political communication in Europe. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623016
Abdalla, J. (2020, January 1). One year under Brazil’s Bolsonaro: ‘What we expected him to be.’ Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/1/1/one-year-under-brazils-bolsonaro-what-we-expected-him-to-be
Agence France Press. (2019, April 7). Jair Bolsonaro struggles in first 100 days as Brazil President. Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/world/americas/jair-bolsonaro-struggles-in-first-100-days-as-brazil-president
Anderson, C. J. (2007). The end of economic voting? Contingency dilemmas and the limits of democratic accountability. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.050806.155344
Bache, I., Bartle, I., Flinders, M., & Marsden, G. (2015). Blame games and climate change: Accountability, multi-level governance and carbon management. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 17(1), 64–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12040
Béland, D. (2007). Insecurity and politics: a framework. The Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 317–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/20460646
Béland, D., & Waddan, A. (2021). Austerity, populism, and the politics of blame: an ideational perspective. In B. Greve (Ed.), Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State (pp. 94–109). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906745.00014
Bhat, P., & Chadha, K. (2020). Anti-media populism: Expressions of media distrust by right-wing media in India. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 13(2), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2020.1739320
Boin, A., ‘t Hart, P., & McConnell, A. (2009). Crisis exploitation: political and policy impacts of framing contests. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802453221
Bovens, M. A. P., ‘t Hart, P., Dekker, S., Verheuvel, G., & Anheier, H. K. (1999). The politics of blame avoidance: defensive tactics in a Dutch crime-fighting scenario. In V. L. Barker III & J. T. Mahoney (Eds.), When Things Go Wrong: Organizational Failures and Breakdowns (pp. 123–147). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231457.n8
Brändström, A., & Kuipers, S. (2003). From ‘Normal Incidents’ to Political Crises: Understanding the Selective Politicization of Policy failures. Government and opposition, 38(3), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-7053.t01-1-00016
Brändström, A., Kuipers, S., & Daléus, P. (2008). The politics of tsunami responses: comparing patterns of blame management in Scandinavia. In A. Boin, A. McConnell, & P. T. Hart (Eds.), Governing after crisis: The politics of investigation, accountability and learning (pp. 114–147). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511756122.005
Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184
Carlson, M., Robinson, S., & Lewis, S. C. (2021). Digital press criticism: The symbolic dimensions of Donald Trump’s assault on US journalists as the “enemy of the people.” Digital Journalism, 9(6), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1836981
De Cleen, B. (2019). The populist political logic and the analysis of the discursive construction of ‘the people’ and ‘the elite.’ In J. Zienkowski & R. Breeze (Eds.), Imagining the Peoples of Europe: Populist discourses across the political spectrum (pp. 19–42). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.83.02cle
Deutsch, S., & Fletcher, R. (2022). The ‘Bolsonaro bridge’: Violence, visibility, and the 2019 Amazon fires. Environmental Science & Policy, 132, 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.02.012
Dowding, K. (2020). It’s the government, stupid: How governments blame citizens for their own policies. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529206388.001.0001
Egelhofer, J. L., Aaldering, L., & Lecheler, S. (2021). Delegitimizing the media? Analyzing politicians’ media criticism on social media. Journal of Language and Politics, 20(5), 653–675. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20081.ege
Engesser, S., Fawzi, N., & Larsson, A. O. (2017). Populist online communication: Introduction to the special issue. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1279–1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328525
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Farnsworth, S. J., & Lichter, S. R. (2011). The Contemporary Presidency: The Return of the Honeymoon: Television News Coverage of New Presidents, 1981–2009. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 41(3), 590–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2011.03888.x
Federação Nacional dos Jornalistas [FENAJ]. (2020). Violência contra jornalistas e liberdade de imprensa no Brasil, Relatório 2019. https://fenaj.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/relatorio_fenaj_2019.pdf
Fern. (2019, April 10). 100 Days of Bolsonaro - Ending the EU’s role in the assault on the Amazon. https://www.fern.org/publications-insight/100-days-of-bolsonaro-ending-the-eus-role-in-the-assault-on-the-amazon-945
Goffman, E. (2002). The presentation of self in everyday life. 1959. Garden City.
Graff, A., & Korolczuk, E. (2022). Anti-gender politics in the populist moment. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003133520
Hameleers, M., Bos, L., & De Vreese, C. H. (2017). “They did it”: The effects of emotionalized blame attribution in populist communication. Communication Research, 44(6), 870–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644026
Hameleers, M., Bos, L., & De Vreese, C. (2018). Framing blame: Toward a better understanding of the effects of populist communication on populist party preferences. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 28(3), 380–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2017.1407326
Hameleers, M., Reinemann, C., Schmuck, D., & Fawzi, N. (2019). The persuasiveness of populist communication: Conceptualizing the effects and political consequences of populist communication from a social identity perspective. In C. Reinemann, J. Stanyer, T. Aalberg, F. Esser, & C. H. de Vreese (Eds.), Communicating Populism: Comparing actor perceptions, media coverage, and effects on citizens in Europe (pp. 143–167). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429402067-8
Hansson, S. (2015). Discursive strategies of blame avoidance in government: A framework for analysis. Discourse & Society, 26(3), 297–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514564736
Hansson, S. (2017). Anticipative strategies of blame avoidance in government: The case of communication guidelines. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(2), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15019.han
Hansson, S. (2018). Defensive semiotic strategies in government: A multimodal study of blame avoidance. Social Semiotics, 28(4), 472–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1334358
Hartmann, R. (1980). Contrastive Textology: Comparative Discourse Analysis in Applied Linguistics. Studies in Descriptive Linguistics (Vol. 5). Heinle & Heinle Publishers.Heinkelmann‐Wild, T., & Zangl, B. (2020). Multilevel blame games: Blame‐shifting in the European Union. Governance, 33(4), 953–969. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12459
Hinterleitner, M. (2017). Reconciling perspectives on blame avoidance behaviour. Political Studies Review, 15(2), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12099
Hinterleitner, M. (2020). Policy controversies and political blame games. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108860116
Hinterleitner, M., & Sager, F. (2015). Avoiding Blame—A Comprehensive Framework and the Australian Home Insulation Program Fiasco. Policy Studies Journal, 43(1), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12088
Hinterleitner, M., & Sager, F. (2017). Anticipatory and reactive forms of blame avoidance: Of foxes and lions. European political science review, 9(4), 587–606. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773916000126
Hinterleitner, M., Honegger, C., & Sager, F. (2022). Blame avoidance in hard times: complex governance structures and the COVID-19 pandemic. West European Politics, 46(2), 324–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2064634
Hood, C. (2011). Risk and government: The architectonics of blame-avoidance. In L. Skinns, M. Scott, & T. Cox (Eds.), Risk (pp. 62–84). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511735950.004
Hood, C., Jennings, W., & Copeland, P. (2016). Blame avoidance in comparative perspective: Reactivity, staged retreat and efficacy. Public Administration, 94(2), 542–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12235
Hood, C., Jennings, W., Dixon, R., Hogwood, B., & Beeston, C. (2009). Testing times: Exploring staged responses and the impact of blame management strategies in two examination fiasco cases. European Journal of Political Research, 48(6), 695–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01830.x
Iyengar, S. (1994). Is anyone responsible?: How television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press.
Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x
Katsambekis, G. (2022). Constructing ‘the people’ of populism: A critique of the ideational approach from a discursive perspective. Journal of Political Ideologies, 27(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2020.1844372
Koliska, M., Chadha, K., & Burns, A. (2020). Talking back: Journalists defending attacks against their profession in the Trump era. Journalism Studies, 21(11), 1496–1513. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1763190
Krämer, B. (2018). Populism, media, and the form of society. Communication theory, 28(4), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty017
Kuipers, S., & Brändström, A. (2020). Accountability and blame avoidance after crises. In M. Wagner, D. Morisi, W. R. Thompson, & R. Dalton (Eds.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1498
Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.
Lakoff, G. (2008). The political mind: why you can’t understand 21st-century politics with an 18th-century brain. Penguin.
Leong, C., & Howlett, M. (2017). On credit and blame: Disentangling the motivations of public policy decision-making behaviour. Policy Sciences, 50, 599–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9290-4
Lubianco, J. (2020, August 24). Bolsonaro’s threat to assault a reporter puts journalists at risk, press associations said. LatAm Journalism Review. https://latamjournalismreview.org/articles/bolsonaros-threat-to-assault-a-reporter-puts-journalists-at-risk-press-associations-said/
Macaraig, A., & Hameleers, M. (2022). #DefendPressFreedom: Paradigm Repair, Role Perceptions and Filipino Journalists’ Counterstrategies to Anti-Media Populism and Delegitimizing Threats. Journalism Studies, 23(16), 2078–2096. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2138949
Mayring, P. (2019). Qualitative Content Analysis: Demarcation, Varieties, Developments. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3343
Meeks, L. (2020). Defining the enemy: How Donald Trump frames the news media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(1), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019857676
Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804799331
Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. (2014). Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style. Political Studies, 62(2), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12032
Mortensen, P. B. (2012). “It’s the Central Government’s Fault”: Elected Regional Officials’ Use of Blame‐Shifting Rhetoric. Governance, 25(3), 439–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01585.x
Mortensen, P. B. (2016). Agencification and blame shifting: Evaluating a neglected side of public sector reforms. Public Administration, 94(3), 630–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12243
Moynihan, D. P. (2012). Extra‐network organizational reputation and blame avoidance in networks: The Hurricane Katrina example. Governance, 25(4), 567–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01593.x
Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492037
Mudde, C. (2014). The Populist Zeitgeist: Government and Opposition. Government and Opposition, 543–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001
Novais, R. A. (2023). A game of masks: the communicative performance of the Portuguese populist far-right. In L. Magalhães & C. O. Martins (Eds.), Masks and human connections: disruptive meanings and cultural challenges (1 ed., pp. 83–98). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16673-0_6
Novais, R. A., & Araújo, V. A. D. (2022). Tensioned civility: presidential delegitimization of the press. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 78(4), 1533–1560. https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2022_78_4_1533
Olivas Osuna, J. J. (2021). From chasing populists to deconstructing populism: A new multidimensional approach to understanding and comparing populism. European Journal of Political Research, 60(4), 829–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12428
Ostiguy, P. (2017). A socio-cultural approach. In M. Oswald (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism (pp. 73–97). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.3
Ozawa, J. V., Lukito, J., Lee, T., Varma, A., & Alves, R. (2023). Attacks Against Journalists in Brazil: Catalyzing Effects and Resilience During Jair Bolsonaro’s Government. The International Journal of Press/Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612231182618
Panievsky, A. (2021). Covering populist media criticism: When journalists’ professional norms turn against them. International Journal of Communication, 15, 20. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/15299
Rogers, M. (2023). Coding Qualitative Data. In J. M. Okoko, S. Tunison, & K. D. Walker (Eds.), Varieties of Qualitative Research Methods. Springer Texts in Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_12
Sankar, L. V. (2022). Discourse Analysis. In W. D. Crano, M. B. Brewer, & A. Lac (Eds.), Principles of Social Research Methodology (pp. 405–414). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_28
Sarikakis, K., Kassa, B. E., Fenz, N., Goldschmitt, S., Kasser, J., & Nowotarski, L. (2023). “My haters and I”: personal and political responses to hate speech against female journalists in Austria. Feminist Media Studies, 23(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1979068
Schlipphak, B., Meiners, P., Treib, O., & Schäfer, C. (2023). When are governmental blaming strategies effective? How blame, source and trust effects shape citizens’ acceptance of EU sanctions against democratic backsliding. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(9), 1715–1737. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2102671
Stavrakakis, Y., & Katsambekis, G. (2014). Left-wing populism in the European periphery: the case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies, 19(2), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2014.909266
Sulitzeanu‐Kenan, R. (2006). If they get it right: An experimental test of the effects of the appointment and reports of UK public inquiries. Public Administration, 84(3), 623–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00605.x
The Economist. (2020, January 4). Jair Bolsonaro’s contentious first year in office. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/the-americas/2020/01/04/jair-bolsonaros-contentious-first-year-in-office
Van Dalen, A. (2021). Rethinking journalist–politician relations in the age of populism: How outsider politicians delegitimize mainstream journalists. Journalism, 22(11), 2711–2728. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919887822
Van Dijk, T. A. (1992). Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse & Society, 3(1), 87–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003001005
Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
Vasilopoulou, S., Halikiopoulou, D., & Exadaktylos, T. (2014). Greece in Crisis: Austerity, Populism and the Politics of Blame. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(2), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12093
Vis, B. (2016). Taking stock of the comparative literature on the role of blame avoidance strategies in social policy reform. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(2), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2015.1005955
Weaver, R. K. (1986). The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of Public Policy, 6(4), 371–398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00004219
Weaver, R. K. (2018). The nays have it: How rampant blame generating distorts American policy and politics. Political Science Quarterly, 133(2), 259–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12771
Wodak, R. (2006). Blaming and denying: Pragmatics. In K. Brown, Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (pp. 59–64). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04307-8
Wodak, R. (2021). The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-Right Discourse. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529739664
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Rui Alexandre Sousa da Costa Novais, Ângela Maria Teixiera Leite
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. Proposta de Política para Periódicos de Acesso Livre
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Esta revista e os seus artigos estão publicados com a licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Você tem o direito de compartilhar, copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato. Para que isto ocorra: você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas; você não pode usar o material para fins comerciais; e, se você remixar, transformar ou criar a partir do material, você não pode distribuir o material modificado.
Dados de financiamento
-
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Números do Financiamento UIDB/00683/2020;2020.03101.CEECIND