¿El ataque como defensa? Tácticas populistas contra los medios para evitar la culpa

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2024.27.4.7

Palabras clave:

Comunicación política populista de derechas, evasión de culpas, estrategias discursivas defensivas anticipativas y reactivas, antielitismo, ataques contra la prensa

Resumen

En el presente artículo, se explora la relación entre la culpa y el populismo mediante el análisis de las estrategias de comunicación defensivas que emplean los líderes populistas de derecha en sus ataques contra los medios. El estudio se enfoca en Jair Bolsonaro y concluye que el expresidente hizo uso de diferentes estrategias para evadir su responsabilidad por los resultados negativos, a la vez que culpaba a los medios como uno de sus blancos favoritos. El estudio explorativo se basa en el análisis cualitativo del discurso de las narrativas presidenciales a fin de arrojar luz sobre la naturaleza paradójica de estas estrategias defensivas. Los resultados demuestran que el estilo político de Bolsonaro implicaba la neutralización preventiva de las críticas de los medios y la reacción negativa ante cualquier cubrimiento que contradijera su versión de los hechos y socavara su autoridad.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Reinemann, C., Stromback, J., & De Vreese, C. (Eds.). (2016). Populist political communication in Europe. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623016

Abdalla, J. (2020, January 1). One year under Brazil’s Bolsonaro: ‘What we expected him to be.’ Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/1/1/one-year-under-brazils-bolsonaro-what-we-expected-him-to-be

Agence France Press. (2019, April 7). Jair Bolsonaro struggles in first 100 days as Brazil President. Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/world/americas/jair-bolsonaro-struggles-in-first-100-days-as-brazil-president

Anderson, C. J. (2007). The end of economic voting? Contingency dilemmas and the limits of democratic accountability. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.050806.155344

Bache, I., Bartle, I., Flinders, M., & Marsden, G. (2015). Blame games and climate change: Accountability, multi-level governance and carbon management. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 17(1), 64–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12040

Béland, D. (2007). Insecurity and politics: a framework. The Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 317–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/20460646

Béland, D., & Waddan, A. (2021). Austerity, populism, and the politics of blame: an ideational perspective. In B. Greve (Ed.), Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State (pp. 94–109). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906745.00014

Bhat, P., & Chadha, K. (2020). Anti-media populism: Expressions of media distrust by right-wing media in India. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 13(2), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2020.1739320

Boin, A., ‘t Hart, P., & McConnell, A. (2009). Crisis exploitation: political and policy impacts of framing contests. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802453221

Bovens, M. A. P., ‘t Hart, P., Dekker, S., Verheuvel, G., & Anheier, H. K. (1999). The politics of blame avoidance: defensive tactics in a Dutch crime-fighting scenario. In V. L. Barker III & J. T. Mahoney (Eds.), When Things Go Wrong: Organizational Failures and Breakdowns (pp. 123–147). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231457.n8

Brändström, A., & Kuipers, S. (2003). From ‘Normal Incidents’ to Political Crises: Understanding the Selective Politicization of Policy failures. Government and opposition, 38(3), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-7053.t01-1-00016

Brändström, A., Kuipers, S., & Daléus, P. (2008). The politics of tsunami responses: comparing patterns of blame management in Scandinavia. In A. Boin, A. McConnell, & P. T. Hart (Eds.), Governing after crisis: The politics of investigation, accountability and learning (pp. 114–147). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511756122.005

Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00184

Carlson, M., Robinson, S., & Lewis, S. C. (2021). Digital press criticism: The symbolic dimensions of Donald Trump’s assault on US journalists as the “enemy of the people.” Digital Journalism, 9(6), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1836981

De Cleen, B. (2019). The populist political logic and the analysis of the discursive construction of ‘the people’ and ‘the elite.’ In J. Zienkowski & R. Breeze (Eds.), Imagining the Peoples of Europe: Populist discourses across the political spectrum (pp. 19–42). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.83.02cle

Deutsch, S., & Fletcher, R. (2022). The ‘Bolsonaro bridge’: Violence, visibility, and the 2019 Amazon fires. Environmental Science & Policy, 132, 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.02.012

Dowding, K. (2020). It’s the government, stupid: How governments blame citizens for their own policies. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529206388.001.0001

Egelhofer, J. L., Aaldering, L., & Lecheler, S. (2021). Delegitimizing the media? Analyzing politicians’ media criticism on social media. Journal of Language and Politics, 20(5), 653–675. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20081.ege

Engesser, S., Fawzi, N., & Larsson, A. O. (2017). Populist online communication: Introduction to the special issue. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1279–1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328525

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Farnsworth, S. J., & Lichter, S. R. (2011). The Contemporary Presidency: The Return of the Honeymoon: Television News Coverage of New Presidents, 1981–2009. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 41(3), 590–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2011.03888.x

Federação Nacional dos Jornalistas [FENAJ]. (2020). Violência contra jornalistas e liberdade de imprensa no Brasil, Relatório 2019. https://fenaj.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/relatorio_fenaj_2019.pdf

Fern. (2019, April 10). 100 Days of Bolsonaro - Ending the EU’s role in the assault on the Amazon. https://www.fern.org/publications-insight/100-days-of-bolsonaro-ending-the-eus-role-in-the-assault-on-the-amazon-945

Goffman, E. (2002). The presentation of self in everyday life. 1959. Garden City.

Graff, A., & Korolczuk, E. (2022). Anti-gender politics in the populist moment. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003133520

Hameleers, M., Bos, L., & De Vreese, C. H. (2017). “They did it”: The effects of emotionalized blame attribution in populist communication. Communication Research, 44(6), 870–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644026

Hameleers, M., Bos, L., & De Vreese, C. (2018). Framing blame: Toward a better understanding of the effects of populist communication on populist party preferences. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 28(3), 380–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2017.1407326

Hameleers, M., Reinemann, C., Schmuck, D., & Fawzi, N. (2019). The persuasiveness of populist communication: Conceptualizing the effects and political consequences of populist communication from a social identity perspective. In C. Reinemann, J. Stanyer, T. Aalberg, F. Esser, & C. H. de Vreese (Eds.), Communicating Populism: Comparing actor perceptions, media coverage, and effects on citizens in Europe (pp. 143–167). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429402067-8

Hansson, S. (2015). Discursive strategies of blame avoidance in government: A framework for analysis. Discourse & Society, 26(3), 297–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514564736

Hansson, S. (2017). Anticipative strategies of blame avoidance in government: The case of communication guidelines. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(2), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.15019.han

Hansson, S. (2018). Defensive semiotic strategies in government: A multimodal study of blame avoidance. Social Semiotics, 28(4), 472–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1334358

Hartmann, R. (1980). Contrastive Textology: Comparative Discourse Analysis in Applied Linguistics. Studies in Descriptive Linguistics (Vol. 5). Heinle & Heinle Publishers.Heinkelmann‐Wild, T., & Zangl, B. (2020). Multilevel blame games: Blame‐shifting in the European Union. Governance, 33(4), 953–969. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12459

Hinterleitner, M. (2017). Reconciling perspectives on blame avoidance behaviour. Political Studies Review, 15(2), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12099

Hinterleitner, M. (2020). Policy controversies and political blame games. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108860116

Hinterleitner, M., & Sager, F. (2015). Avoiding Blame—A Comprehensive Framework and the Australian Home Insulation Program Fiasco. Policy Studies Journal, 43(1), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12088

Hinterleitner, M., & Sager, F. (2017). Anticipatory and reactive forms of blame avoidance: Of foxes and lions. European political science review, 9(4), 587–606. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773916000126

Hinterleitner, M., Honegger, C., & Sager, F. (2022). Blame avoidance in hard times: complex governance structures and the COVID-19 pandemic. West European Politics, 46(2), 324–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2064634

Hood, C. (2011). Risk and government: The architectonics of blame-avoidance. In L. Skinns, M. Scott, & T. Cox (Eds.), Risk (pp. 62–84). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511735950.004

Hood, C., Jennings, W., & Copeland, P. (2016). Blame avoidance in comparative perspective: Reactivity, staged retreat and efficacy. Public Administration, 94(2), 542–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12235

Hood, C., Jennings, W., Dixon, R., Hogwood, B., & Beeston, C. (2009). Testing times: Exploring staged responses and the impact of blame management strategies in two examination fiasco cases. European Journal of Political Research, 48(6), 695–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01830.x

Iyengar, S. (1994). Is anyone responsible?: How television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press.

Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x

Katsambekis, G. (2022). Constructing ‘the people’ of populism: A critique of the ideational approach from a discursive perspective. Journal of Political Ideologies, 27(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2020.1844372

Koliska, M., Chadha, K., & Burns, A. (2020). Talking back: Journalists defending attacks against their profession in the Trump era. Journalism Studies, 21(11), 1496–1513. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1763190

Krämer, B. (2018). Populism, media, and the form of society. Communication theory, 28(4), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty017

Kuipers, S., & Brändström, A. (2020). Accountability and blame avoidance after crises. In M. Wagner, D. Morisi, W. R. Thompson, & R. Dalton (Eds.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1498

Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.

Lakoff, G. (2008). The political mind: why you can’t understand 21st-century politics with an 18th-century brain. Penguin.

Leong, C., & Howlett, M. (2017). On credit and blame: Disentangling the motivations of public policy decision-making behaviour. Policy Sciences, 50, 599–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9290-4

Lubianco, J. (2020, August 24). Bolsonaro’s threat to assault a reporter puts journalists at risk, press associations said. LatAm Journalism Review. https://latamjournalismreview.org/articles/bolsonaros-threat-to-assault-a-reporter-puts-journalists-at-risk-press-associations-said/

Macaraig, A., & Hameleers, M. (2022). #DefendPressFreedom: Paradigm Repair, Role Perceptions and Filipino Journalists’ Counterstrategies to Anti-Media Populism and Delegitimizing Threats. Journalism Studies, 23(16), 2078–2096. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2138949

Mayring, P. (2019). Qualitative Content Analysis: Demarcation, Varieties, Developments. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3343

Meeks, L. (2020). Defining the enemy: How Donald Trump frames the news media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(1), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019857676

Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804799331

Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. (2014). Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style. Political Studies, 62(2), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12032

Mortensen, P. B. (2012). “It’s the Central Government’s Fault”: Elected Regional Officials’ Use of Blame‐Shifting Rhetoric. Governance, 25(3), 439–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01585.x

Mortensen, P. B. (2016). Agencification and blame shifting: Evaluating a neglected side of public sector reforms. Public Administration, 94(3), 630–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12243

Moynihan, D. P. (2012). Extra‐network organizational reputation and blame avoidance in networks: The Hurricane Katrina example. Governance, 25(4), 567–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01593.x

Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x

Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492037

Mudde, C. (2014). The Populist Zeitgeist: Government and Opposition. Government and Opposition, 543–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x

Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001

Novais, R. A. (2023). A game of masks: the communicative performance of the Portuguese populist far-right. In L. Magalhães & C. O. Martins (Eds.), Masks and human connections: disruptive meanings and cultural challenges (1 ed., pp. 83–98). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16673-0_6

Novais, R. A., & Araújo, V. A. D. (2022). Tensioned civility: presidential delegitimization of the press. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 78(4), 1533–1560. https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2022_78_4_1533

Olivas Osuna, J. J. (2021). From chasing populists to deconstructing populism: A new multidimensional approach to understanding and comparing populism. European Journal of Political Research, 60(4), 829–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12428

Ostiguy, P. (2017). A socio-cultural approach. In M. Oswald (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism (pp. 73–97). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.3

Ozawa, J. V., Lukito, J., Lee, T., Varma, A., & Alves, R. (2023). Attacks Against Journalists in Brazil: Catalyzing Effects and Resilience During Jair Bolsonaro’s Government. The International Journal of Press/Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612231182618

Panievsky, A. (2021). Covering populist media criticism: When journalists’ professional norms turn against them. International Journal of Communication, 15, 20. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/15299

Rogers, M. (2023). Coding Qualitative Data. In J. M. Okoko, S. Tunison, & K. D. Walker (Eds.), Varieties of Qualitative Research Methods. Springer Texts in Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04394-9_12

Sankar, L. V. (2022). Discourse Analysis. In W. D. Crano, M. B. Brewer, & A. Lac (Eds.), Principles of Social Research Methodology (pp. 405–414). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_28

Sarikakis, K., Kassa, B. E., Fenz, N., Goldschmitt, S., Kasser, J., & Nowotarski, L. (2023). “My haters and I”: personal and political responses to hate speech against female journalists in Austria. Feminist Media Studies, 23(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2021.1979068

Schlipphak, B., Meiners, P., Treib, O., & Schäfer, C. (2023). When are governmental blaming strategies effective? How blame, source and trust effects shape citizens’ acceptance of EU sanctions against democratic backsliding. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(9), 1715–1737. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2102671

Stavrakakis, Y., & Katsambekis, G. (2014). Left-wing populism in the European periphery: the case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies, 19(2), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2014.909266

Sulitzeanu‐Kenan, R. (2006). If they get it right: An experimental test of the effects of the appointment and reports of UK public inquiries. Public Administration, 84(3), 623–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00605.x

The Economist. (2020, January 4). Jair Bolsonaro’s contentious first year in office. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/the-americas/2020/01/04/jair-bolsonaros-contentious-first-year-in-office

Van Dalen, A. (2021). Rethinking journalist–politician relations in the age of populism: How outsider politicians delegitimize mainstream journalists. Journalism, 22(11), 2711–2728. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919887822

Van Dijk, T. A. (1992). Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse & Society, 3(1), 87–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003001005

Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001

Vasilopoulou, S., Halikiopoulou, D., & Exadaktylos, T. (2014). Greece in Crisis: Austerity, Populism and the Politics of Blame. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(2), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12093

Vis, B. (2016). Taking stock of the comparative literature on the role of blame avoidance strategies in social policy reform. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(2), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2015.1005955

Weaver, R. K. (1986). The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of Public Policy, 6(4), 371–398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00004219

Weaver, R. K. (2018). The nays have it: How rampant blame generating distorts American policy and politics. Political Science Quarterly, 133(2), 259–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12771

Wodak, R. (2006). Blaming and denying: Pragmatics. In K. Brown, Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (pp. 59–64). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04307-8

Wodak, R. (2021). The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-Right Discourse. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529739664

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.

Descargas

Publicado

2024-08-26

Cómo citar

Novais, R. A. S. da C., & Leite, Ângela M. T. (2024). ¿El ataque como defensa? Tácticas populistas contra los medios para evitar la culpa. Palabra Clave, 27(4), e2747. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2024.27.4.7

Número

Sección

Artículos

Datos de los fondos