Viés de atenção às imagens das mudanças climáticas e seu impacto no engajamento cidadão

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2024.27.4.5

Palavras-chave:

Atenção, mudança climática, imagens, meio ambiente, percepção

Resumo

A comunicação visual pode influenciar a percepção pública da crise climática. Neste estudo, avalia-se até que ponto o viés de atenção às imagens relacionadas às mudanças climáticas está ligado às atitudes pró-ambientais. A partir de uma abordagem de autorrelato aplicada a 312 universitários, que foram expostos a peças negativas, positivas e neutras, constatou-se que a valência emocional delas é fundamental para a percepção de risco. Os resultados sugerem que as imagens que enfatizam as perdas ambientais e econômicas podem ser mais atraentes, mas desmotivam e impedem o desenvolvimento do pensamento mais reflexivo sobre o que cada um pode contribuir, enquanto as imagens positivas convidam as pessoas a pensarem de forma ampla e a encontrarem soluções. Nesse sentido, constatou-se que a capacidade do público de visualizar metas e sucessos de curto prazo gera mais disposição para apoiar soluções ambientais. Essas descobertas fornecem evidências sobre as imagens que devem ser usadas para estimular o envolvimento dos cidadãos no combate às mudanças climáticas. Os resultados sugerem que não é conveniente transmitir visões perturbadoras ou sentimentos de medo ou de desconforto para o público, a fim de evitar respostas psicológicas defensivas de rejeição às questões ambientais.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Alexa (2023). The top 500 sites on the web. https://www.alexa.com/topsites

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

Anwar, R. (2023). The emotional and behavioral effects of youth exposure to images of the global climate change crisis and its relationship to their personal characteristics Quasi-experimental study. Journal of Mass Communication Research, 68(1), 3-110. https://doi.org/10.21608/jsb.2023.323785

Bendall, R., Begley, S. y Thompson, C. (2021). Interactive influences of emotion and extraversion on visual attention. Brain and Behavior, 11, e2387. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2387

Bord, R., Fisher, A. y O’Connor, R. (1998). Public perceptions of global warming: United States and international perspectives. Climate Research, 11, 75-84. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr011075

Bradley, M., Sabatinelli, D., Lang, P., Fitzsimmons, J., King, W. y Desai, P. (2003). Activation of the visual cortex in motivated attention. Behavioral Neuroscience, 117(2), 369-380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.117.2.369

Carlson, J., Kaull, H., Steinhauer, M., Zigarac, A. y Cammarata, J. (2020). Paying attention to climate change: Positive images of climate change solutions capture attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101477

Chapman, D., Corner, A., Webster, R. y Markowitz, E. (2016). Climate visuals: A mixed methods investigation of public perceptions of climate images in three countries. Global Environmental Change, 41, 172-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.003

Cook, J. y Lewandowsky, S. (2016). Rational irrationality: Modeling climate change belief polarization using bayesian networks. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8, 160-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12186

Desnoyers, L. (2011). Toward a taxonomy of visuals in science communication. Technical Communication, 58(2), 119-134.

Dixon, G., McKeever, B., Holton, A., Clarke, C. y Eosco, G. (2015). The power of a picture: overcoming scientific misinformation by communicating weight-of-evidence information with visual exemplars. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 639-659. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12159

Doyle, J. (2007). Picturing the clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the representational politics of climate change communication. Science as Culture, 16(2), 129-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430701368938

Duan, R., Takahashi, B. y Zwickle, A. (2021). How effective are concrete and abstract climate change images? The moderating role of construal level in climate change visual communication. Science Communication, 43(3), 358-387. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470211008192

Erviti, M. C. (2013). Las imágenes del cambio climático en los informativos de televisión. Análisis de seis televisiones españolas de cobertura nacional. [Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Navarra]. http://dadun.unav.edu/handle/10171/39019

Fox, E., Mathews, A., Calder, A. y Yiend, J. (2007). Anxiety and sensitivity to gaze direction in emotionally expressive faces. Emotion, 7(3), 478-486. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.478

Fredrickson, B. y Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition & emotion, 19(3), 313-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000238

Fredrickson, B. y Branigan, C. (2001). Positive emotions. En Mayne, T. y Bonnano, G. (eds.), Emotion: Current issues and future directions (pp. 123-151). Guilford Press.

Fredrickson, B. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. The American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.56.3.218

Ghoushchi, S., Yazdani, H., Dowlatabadi, H. y Ahmadian, M. (2021). A multimodal discourse analysis of pictures in ELT textbooks: Modes of communication in focus. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 13(4), 623-644. https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.13.4.2

Gigante, M. (2012). Accommodating scientific illiteracy: Award-winning visualizations on the covers of Science. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 42(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.42.1.c

Heim, M. (1998). Virtual realism. Oxford University Press.

Kaltenborn, B. y Bjerke, T. (2002). Association between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00243-2

Kahn-Harris, K. (2018). Denialism: What drives people to reject the truth. The Guardian, 3 de agosto. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/aug/03/denialism-what-drives-people-to-reject-the-truth

Lane, R., Chua, P. y Dolan, R. (1999). Common effects of emotional valence, arousal and attention on neural activation during visual processing of pictures. Neuropsychologia, 37(9), 989-997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00017-2

Lehman, B., Thompson, J., Davis, S. y Carlson, J. (2019). Affective images of climate change. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00960

Leiserowitz, A. (2005). American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous? Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 25(6), 1433-1442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00690.x

León, B., Negredo, S. y Erviti, M. C. (2022). Social engagement with climate change: Principles for effective visual representation on social media. Climate Policy, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2077292

Le Meur, O., Le Callet, P., Barba, D. y Thoreau, D. (2006). A coherent computational approach to model the bottom-up visual attention. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28(5), 802-817. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2006.86

Lombard, M., Reich, R., Grabe, M., Bracken, C. y Ditton, T. (2000). Presence and television: The role of screen size. Human Communication Research, 26(1), 75-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00750.x

Luna, D., Bering, J. y Halberstadt, J. (2022). The value and distinctiveness of awe in science communication: Comparing the incidence and content of ‘awesome’ representations in science and non-science picture books. International Journal of Science Education, 12(2), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2022.2048119

Luo, Y. y Zhao, J. (2019). Motivated attention in climate change perception and action. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01541

Manzo, K. (2010). Imaging vulnerability: The iconography of climate change. Area, 42(1), 96-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00887.x

Markowtiz, E., Slovic, P., Vastfjall, D. y Hodges, S. (2013). Compassion fade and the challenge of environmental conservation. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(4), 397-406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S193029750000526X

Mayer, J., Salovey, P. y Caruso, D. (2004). Emotional intelligence: Theory, findings, and implications. Psychological Inquiry, 15(3), 197-215. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1503_02

Min, X., Zhai, G., Gu, K., Liu, J., Wang, S., Zhang, X. y Yang, X. (2017). Visual attention analysis and prediction on human faces. Information Sciences, 420, 417-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.08.040

Muñoz-Pico, H. P. y Viteri-Mancero, F. (2022). Del ver al compartir: el rol de las emociones en la propagación de contenidos sobre cambio climático en YouTube. Palabra Clave, 25(2), e2526. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2022.25.2.6

Muñoz-Pico, H. P., León, B. y García-Martínez, A. N. (2021). Representación del cambio climático en YouTube: un análisis cuantitativo de los vídeos más populares. Palabra Clave, 24(1), e2415. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2021.24.1.5

Nicholson-Cole, S. (2005). Representing climate change futures: A critique on the use of images for visual communication. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29(3), 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2004.05.002

Nudo, R. J. P. (2007). Postinfarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery. Stroke, 38, 840-845. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000 247943.12887.d2

O’Neill, S. (2022). Defining a visual metonym: A hauntological study of polar bear imagery in climate communication. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 47, 1104-1119. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12543

O’Neill, S. (2020). More than meets the eye: A longitudinal analysis of climate change imagery in the print media. Climatic Change 163, 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02504-8

O’Neill, S. (2017). Engaging with climate change imagery. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.371

O’Neill, S. y Hulme, M. (2009). An iconic approach for representing climate change. Global Environmental Change, 19(4), 402-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.07.004

Paré M. y Munoz, D. (2001). Expression of a recentering bias in saccade regulation by superior colliculus neurons. Experimental Brain Research, 137(3-4), 354-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210000647

Pew Research Center (s.f.). Climate Change Concern Quiz. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/quiz/climate-change-concern-quiz/

Plutchik, R. (2001). The nature of emotions. American Scientist, 89(4), 344-350. https://doi.org/10.1511/2001.28.344

Powell, J. (2019). Scientists reach 100% consensus on anthropogenic global warming. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 37(4), 183-184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467619886266

Rahmstorf, S. (2004). The climate sceptics weather catastrophes and climate change. Is there still hope for us. PG Verlag.

Ren, D., Wang, P., Qiao, H. y Zheng, S. (2013). A biologically inspired model of emotion eliciting from visual stimuli. Neurocomputing: An International Journal, 121, 328-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467619886266

Richards, D. y Jacobson, E. (2022). How real is too real? User-testing the effects of realism as a risk communication strategy in sea level rise visualizations. Technical Communication Quarterly, 31(2), 190-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2021.1986135

Ritter, M. (2020). Science says: How risky is that virus? Your mind may mislead. Associated Press, 5 de marzo. https://apnews.com/

Schneider, W. y Shiffrin, R. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1-66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1

Slovic, P. (2010a). The psychology of risk. Saúde E Sociedade, 19(4), 731-747. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902010000400002

Slovic, P. (2010b). Introduction and overview. En Slovic, P. (ed.), The feeling of risk: New perspectives on risk perception (pp. XIX-XXVII). Earthscan.

Sprague, T., Saproo, S. y Serences, J. (2015). Visual attention mitigates information loss in small- and large-scale neural codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(4), 215-226. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902010000400002

Sutton, J. y Fischer, L. (2021). Understanding visual risk communication messages: An analysis of visual attention allocation and think-aloud responses to tornado graphics. Weather, Climate, and Society, 13(1), 173-188. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-20-0042.1

Tatler, B. (2007). The central fixation bias in scene viewing: Selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions. Journal of Vision, 7(14), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.14.4

Taub, E. y Uswatte, G. (2006). Constraint-induced movement therapy: Answers and questions after two decades of research. Neuro Rehabilitation, 21, 93-95. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-2006-21201

Watson, D., Clark, L. y Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063

Wilson, B. (2008). Neuropsychological rehabilitation. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.4.022007.141212

Publicado

2024-12-17

Como Citar

Muñoz-Pico, H. P., & León Anguiano, B. (2024). Viés de atenção às imagens das mudanças climáticas e seu impacto no engajamento cidadão. Palabra Clave, 27(4), e2745. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2024.27.4.5

Edição

Seção

Artículos