O debate político em televisão em tempos de eleições: uma promessa de pluralismo que os usuários das redes sociais custam reconhecer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2022.25.4.6Palavras-chave:
Pluralismo, programas políticos televisivos, período eleitoral, reações nas redes sociaisResumo
Esta pesquisa se propôs analisar, por um lado, as promessas de pluralismo de quatro canais de televisão nos meses prévios às eleições de 25 de outubro de 2020 no Chile e, por outro, como o público do YouTube e do Twitter reagiu a elas. Mediante um método misto de análise de conteúdo e análise qualitativa, constatou-se que o pluralismo não era um dos aspectos mais mencionados pelo público nessas redes sociais e, quando houve alusões a ele, a avaliação foi negativa. Este artigo pretende contribuir para os estudos sobre o pluralismo não somente no Chile, mas também num nível mais geral, ao focar-se num fenômeno global, como são as possibilidades de participação que as redes sociais oferecem ao público que consome conteúdos jornalísticos.
Downloads
Referências
Acosta, M. (2022). El debate presidencial en Argentina. Twitter, líderes de opinión y discusión polarizada. Más Poder Local, 48, 114-134. https://doi.org/10.56151/298.46.7
Anderson, C. W. (2011). Deliberative, agonistic, and algorithmic audiences: Journalism’s vision of its public in an age of audience transparency. International Journal of Communication, 5, 529-547.
Anstead, N., & O’Loughlin, B. (2011) The emerging viewertariat and BBC Question Time: Television debate and real-time commenting online. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), 440-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211415519
Camaj, L. (2021). Real time political deliberation on social media: can televised debates lead to rational and civil discussions on broadcasters’ Facebook pages? Information, Communication & Society, 24(13), 1907-1924. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1749695
Castillo, Q. L. (2014). Interactividad y audiencias en los periódicos digitales. Estudio de tres medios mexicanos. Intersticios sociales, 8, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.55555/IS.8.71
Chirinos, E., & Torres-Salas, L. (2015). La participación ciudadana: un desafío para el ciberperiodismo. Temas de Comunicación, 31, 123-148.
Del Valle, R. (2018). Las audiencias activas y la credibilidad de los medios de comunicación en México. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias de la Información. http://eprints. ucm. es/47825/1, 39971
Del Valle, N., & Carreño, F. (2020). Diversos pero concentrados: percepciones de los comunicadores sobre el pluralismo de los medios digitales en Chile. Comunicación y Medios, 29(42), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-1529.2020.57636
Dimitrova, D. V., Shehata, A., Strömback, J., & Nord, L. W. (2014). The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel data. Communication Research, 41(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211426004
Domínguez Cortina, R. (2011). Los debates político-electorales televisados en México en la voz de dos generaciones y votantes: un estudio de recepción en el ámbito de la comunicación política. Global Media Journal México, 8(15), 98-122. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=68718411005
Doyle, G. (2002). Media Ownership. Sage.
European Commission. (1999). Principles and Guidelines for the Community’s Audiovisual Policy in the Digital Age. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(1999)657.
Fenoll, V. (2011). Usuarios activos y pasivos. La interactividad de la audiencia en los medios digitales: el caso de la Fórmula 1 en Valencia. Aposta: Revista de ciencias sociales, 2-26.
Gibbons, T. (2015). Active Pluralism: Dialogue and Engagement as Basic Media Policy Principles. International Journal of Communication, 9, 1932-8036.
González-Neira, A., Berrocal-Gonzalo, S., & Zamora-Martínez, P. (2020). Fórmulas de emisión y consumo de los debates televisivos en España en las elecciones legislativas de 2019. El profesional de la información, 29(2), e290221. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.21
Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems. Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790867
Hallvard, M., & Ytre-Arne, B. (2021). The Democratic Significance of Everyday News Use: Using Diaries to Understand Public Connection over Time and beyond Journalism. Digital Journalism, 10(1), 43-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1850308
Hasebrink, U. (2011). Giving the audience a voice: The role of research in making media regulation more responsive to the needs of the audience. Journal of Information Policy, 1, 312-336. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.1.2011.0321
Hermida, A. (2014). Twitter as an ambient news network. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt, & C. Puschmann (Eds.), Twitter and Society (pp. 359-372). Peter Lang.
Humanes, M. L., Sánchez, M. D. M., de Dios, R. M., & López-Berini, A. (2013). Pluralismo y paralelismo político en la información televisiva en España. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (68), 24-16. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2013-990
Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual Poachers: Television Fans & Participatory Culture. Routledge.
Jenkins, R., & Mendelsohn, M. (2001) The News Media and Referendums. In M. Mendelsohn & A. Parkin (Eds.), Referendum Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403900968_11
Karppinen, K. (2013). Rethinking media pluralism. Fordham Univ Press. https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823245123.001.0001
Keane, J. (1991). Media and Democracy. Polity Press.
Keane, J., & Feenstra, R. (2014). Democracia monitorizada en España. Nuevas formas de participación política en el marco de la era digital. Telos: Cuadernos de comunicación e innovación, 98, 48-57.
Loosen, W., Reimer, J., & Hölig, S. (2020). What journalists want and what they ought to do (In)Congruences between journalists’ role conceptions and audiences’ expectations. Journalism Studies, 21(12), 1744-1774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1790026
MacGregor, P., Balcytiene, A., Fortunati, L., Nuust, V., O’Sullivan, J., Roussou, N., & Sarrica, M. (2011). A cross-regional comparison of selected European newspaper journalists and their evolving attitudes towards the internet – including a singlecountry focus on the UK. Journalism, 12(5), 627-646. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884910388231
Maddux, K. (2021). Viewing deliberation: daytime television’s public pedagogy of inclusion, Argumentation and Advocacy, 58(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2021.1936786
Masip, P. (2014). Audiencias activas, democracia y algoritmos. Anuario Think EPI, 8, 260-263.
Mauri-Ríos, M., & Ramon-Vegas, X. (2015). Nuevos sistemas de rendición de cuentas de la información periodística. Exploración del escenario online español. Profesional de la Información, 24(4), 380-389. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.jul.04
McLennan, G. (1995). Pluralism. Open University Press.
McQuail, D. (2007). Revisiting Diversity as a Media Policy Goal. In A. M. Werner & J. Trappel (Eds.), Power, Performance and Politics: Media Policy in Europe. Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845202938-41
Mellado, C. (2012). The Chilean journalist. In D. Weaver & L. Willnat (Eds.), The Global Journalist in the 21st Century (pp. 382–399). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003070740-34
Mendel, T. (2014). Tuning into development: International comparative survey of community broadcasting regulation. UNESCO.
Nielsen, C. E. (2014). Coproduction or cohabitation: Are anonymous online comments on newspaper websites shaping news content? New Media & Society, 16(3), 470-487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487958
Peters, C., & Witschge, T. (2015). From grand narratives of democracy to small expectations of participation, Journalism Practice, 9(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.928455
Picard, R. G. (2014). Twilight or new dawn of journalism? Evidence from the changing news ecosystem. Digital Journalism, 2(3), 273-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.895531
Plantin, Ch. (2005). La argumentación. Editorial Ariel.
Porath, W., Ortega Gunckel, C., & Rojas Soto, A. (2019). La evolución de los formatos de debates presidenciales en la televisión chilena: 1989-2017: Un caso de especiación. Comunicación y Sociedad, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v2019i0.7198
Quintas-Froufe, N., & González-Neira, A. (2014). Audiencias activas: Participación de la audiencia social en la televisión. Comunicar, 22(43), 83-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C43-2014-08
Raeijmaekers, D., & Maeseele, P. (2015). Media, pluralism and democracy: what’s in a name? Media, culture & society, 37(7), 1042-1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715591670
Rodríguez Fernández, L., & Saavedra Llamas, M. (2018). Debate electoral 13-J: la audiencia social en la estrategia digital de los partidos políticos. Tripodos, (41), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.3916/C43-2014-08
Saavedra-Llamas, M., & Rodríguez Fernández, L. (2018). Las cadenas de televisión españolas frente al debate del 13J: estrategias de programación y audiencia social. Fonseca, Journal of Communication, 17(2), 125-136. https://doi.org/10.14201/fjc201817125136
Saldaña, M., McGregor, S., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2015). Social media as a public space for politics: Cross-National comparison of news consumption and participatory behaviors in the United States and the United Kingdom. International Journal of Communication, 9, 3304–3326. https://doi.org/10.14201/fjc201817125136
Santander, P., Elórtegui, C., & Buzzo, C. (2020). Twitter, debates presidenciales y economía de la atención: una simbiosis entre audiencia televisiva y usuarios de redes sociales en época de campaña. Communication & Society, 33(3), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.3.51-65
Stange, H., Salinas, C., Yáñez, C., & Santa Cruz, E. (2018). Pluralismo informativo y burocratización del trabajo periodístico en dos contextos de prensa diaria. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 24(2), 1825-1843. https://doi.org/10.5209/ESMP.62249
Suárez-Villegas, J. C, Rodríguez, R., & Ramon, X. (2020). Pluralismo informativo en la era de la deliberación digital: percepciones de periodistas y ciudadanos. Profesional de la información, 29(5), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.25
Turcotte, J., & Goidel, R. K. (2014). Political knowledge and exposure to the 2012 US presidential debates: Does debate format matter? PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(2), 449-453. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096514000377
Valenzuela, S., Kim, Y., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2012). Social networks that matter: Exploring the role of political discussion for online political participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr037
Van der Meer, T. W., Walter, A., & Aelst, P. V. (2016). The contingency of voter learning: how election debates influenced voters’ ability and accuracy to position parties in the 2010 Dutch election campaign. Political Communication, 33(1), 136-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1016639
Waldvogel, T. (2020). Applying Virtualized Real-Time Response Measurement on TV-Discussions with Multi-Person Panels. Statistics, Politics and Policy, 11(1), 23–58. https://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2018-0013
Zárate, S. (2016). Pluralismo en el Sistema Informativo. Temas de la Agenda Pública, 11(88), 1-14.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Palabra Clave
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Proposta de Política para Periódicos de Acesso Livre
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Esta revista e os seus artigos estão publicados com a licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Você tem o direito de compartilhar, copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato. Para que isto ocorra: você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas; você não pode usar o material para fins comerciais; e, se você remixar, transformar ou criar a partir do material, você não pode distribuir o material modificado.
