Autoridades interpretativas: uma perspectiva teórica sobre datificação e produção de sentido
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2021.24.3.6Palavras-chave:
Datificação, discrepância, mediatização, sentido, teoriaResumo
Este artigo emerge no espaço de contato entre a literatura atual — de corte predominante anglo-saxão — sobre datificação e a perspectiva de Eliseo Verón, vista como uma contribuição latino-americana que abre oportunidades teóricas e empíricas para a discussão crítica dos processos de datificação. Seguindo a perspectiva veroniana, a reflexão sobre os processos de produção, circulação e reconhecimento dos dados ajuda a desnaturalizar a ideia de que o dado é neutral ou compacto, para visibilizar, ao contrário, as condições a partir das quais esses dados são dotados de sentido, enquanto construtos discursivos social e culturalmente situados. Ante outras perspectivas anglo-saxãs que parecem mais populares na academia — como o modelo encoding/decoding de Hall —, este artigo propõe revisitar a descrição da articulação entre sentido e circulação feita por Verón como uma alternativa para descrever os processos de interpretação que consolidam os dados como discursos. Trata-se, portanto, de um ponto de partida para posteriores desenvolvimentos teóricos e pesquisas empíricas, e de uma abertura da perspectiva de Eliseo Verón para contribuir e enriquecer os debates abertos sobre datificação e suas formas de discriminação.
Downloads
Referências
Ali, C. (2021). Farm Fresh Broadband: The Politics of Rural Connectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Averbeck-Lietz, S. (2015). Eliseo Verón leído desde la perspectiva de los estudios en comunicación alemanes: Semio-pragmática, comunicación e investigación en mediatización. Estudios, 33 (enero-junio), 151-163. Recuperado de: https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/restudios/article/view/11609
Baig, R., Roca, R., Freitag, F. y Navarro, L. (2015). Guifi.net, a crowdsourced network infrastructure held in common. Computer Networks, 90, 150-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2015.07.009
Bishop, S. (2018). Anxiety, panic and self-optimization: Inequalities and the YouTube algorithm. Convergence, 24(1), 69-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517736978
Bode, M. y Kristensen, D. B. (2016). The digital doppelgänger within. A study on self-tracking and the quantified self movement. En Assembling consumption: Researching actors, networks and markets (pp. 119-134). Londres: Routledge.
Bory, P. (2020). The Internet Myth: From the Internet Imaginary to Network Ideologies. University of Westminster Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/book48
Brine, K. R. y Poovey, M. (2013). From measuring desire to quantifying expectations: A late nineteenth-century effort to marry economic theory and data. En Gitelman, L. (ed.), ‘Raw Data’ is an Oxymoron (pp. 61-76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chandler, D. (2015). A world without causation: Big data and the coming of age of posthumanism. Millennium, 43(3), 833-851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815576817
Chandler, D. y Fuchs, C. (2019). Digital objects, digital subjects: Interdisciplinary perspectives on capitalism, labour and politics in the age of big data. University of Westminster Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119873743
Clarke, R. (1988). Information technology and dataveillance. Communications of the ACM, 31(5), 498-512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/42411.42413
Cingolani, G. (2020). Recommender systems: The interplay between asymmetry spaces and the mediatisation of access and circulation. En Scolari, C., Fernández, J. L. y Rodriguez-Amat, J. R. (orgs.), Mediatizations. Theoretical conversations between Europe and Latin America (pp. 152-166). Bristol-Chicago: Intellect.
Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice and user interface design. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (octubre), 1275-1275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3379337.3422379
Couldry, N. y Mejias, U. A. (2020). The costs of connection: How data are colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Nueva York: Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2020.1718835
DeNardis, L. y Musiani, F. (2016). Governance by infrastructure. En The turn to infrastructure in Internet governance (pp. 3-21). Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137483591_1
Dencik, L. y Kaun, A. (2020). Datafication and the Welfare State. Global Perspectives, 1(1), 12912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2020.12912
Desrosières, A. (2004). La política de los grandes números. Historia de la razón estadística. Barcelona: Melusina. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17141/mundosplurales.1.2016.2322
Diviani, R. (2018). Consideraciones epistemológicas, teóricas y críticas en relación al big data. En Biselli, R. y Maestri, M. (eds.), La mediatización contemporánea y el desafío del big data (pp. 11-34). Rosario: UNR. Recuperado de: https://cim.unr.edu.ar/publicaciones/1/libros/137/la-mediatizacion-contemporanea-y-el-desafio-del-big-data
Floridi, L. (2019). Semantic conceptions of information. En Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information. Recuperado de: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/information-semantic
Fraser, A. (2019). Curating digital geographies in an era of data colonialism. Geoforum, 104, 193-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.04.027
Gillespie, T. (2017). Regulation of and by platforms. En SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 254-278). Thousand Oaks: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066.n15
Gindin, I. y Busso, M. (2021). El big data bajo la lupa: notas sobre el retrato de una época. En Actis, E., Berdondini, M. y Castro Rojas, S., Ciencias sociales y Big Data. Representaciones políticas, disputas comunicacionales y política internacional (pp. 49-63). Rosario: UNR.
Gitelman, L. y Jackson, V. (2013). Introduction. En Gitelman, L. (ed.), ‘Raw Data’ is an Oxymoron (pp. 1-14). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9302.001.0001
Hacking, I. (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge: Syndicate of the Press of the University of Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819766
Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. En Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A. y Willis, P., Culture, media, language. Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-1979 (pp. 117-127). Taylor y Francis e-Library.
Hintz, A., Dencik, L. y Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2018). Digital citizenship in a datafied society. Cambridge: Polity Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1635186
Hepp, A. (2020). Deep mediatization. Londres: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351064903
Jeanneret, Y. (2020). The trace factory (vol. 3). Londres: Wiley Online Library. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119723189
Kennedy, H. y Hill, R. L. (2018). The feeling of numbers: Emotions in everyday engagements with data and their visualisation. Sociology, 52(4), 830-848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516674675
Krämer, B. (2018). Online music recommendation platforms as representations of ontologies of musical taste. Communications, 43(2), 259-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2017-0056
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Lessig, L. (1998). Open code and open societies: Values of internet governance. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 74, 1405. https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol74/iss3/17
Lohmeier, C., Kaun, A. y Pentzold, C. (2020). Making time in digital societies: Considering the interplay of media, data, and temporalities—An introduction to the special issue. New Media y Society, 22(9), 1521-1527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820913555
Lundby, K. (ed.) (2014). Mediatization of Communication. Berlín/Boston: DeGruyter/Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272215
Lupton, D. (2016). The Quantified Self. Londres: Polity Press.
Lupton, D. y Williamson, B. (2017). The datafied child: The dataveillance of children and implications for their rights. New Media y Society, 19(5), 780-794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686328
Manovich, L. (2001). The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Meghji, A. (2019). Encoding and decoding black and white cultural capitals: Black middle-class experiences. Cultural Sociology, 13(1), 3-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975517741999
Mejias, U. A. y Couldry, N. (2019). Colonialismo de datos: repensando la relación de los datos masivos con el sujeto contemporáneo. Virtualis, 10(18), 78-97. https://www.revistavirtualis.mx/index.php/virtualis/article/view/289
Milan, S. y Treré, E. (2017). Big Data from the South: the beginning of a conversation we must have. SSRN (octubre). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3056958
Morley, D. (1996). Televisión, audiencias y estudios culturales. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Muller, M. (2004). Who owns the internet-ownership as a legal basis for American control of the Internet? Fordham Intellectual Property Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 15(3), 709. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1310&context=iplj
Nafus, F. (2016). Quantified. Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life. MIT Press/eBooks. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262034173.001.0001
Nhan, J. y Carroll, B. A. (2011). The offline defense of the Internet: An examination of the electronic frontier foundation. Science & Technology Law Review, 15(3), 389. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/147643481.pdf
O’Neill, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction. How Big Data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Nueva York: Crown.
Pentzold, C., Brantner, C. y Foelsche, L. (2019). Imagining big data: Illustrations of “big data” in US news articles, 2010-2016. New Media y Society, 21(1), 139-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818791326
Pitron, G. (2018). La guerre des métaux rares: la face cachée de la transition énergétique et numérique. París: Les liens qui libèrent. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rce.025.0212
Powell, A. (2012). Assessing the influence of online activism on Internet policy-making: The case of SOPA/PIPA and ACTA. SSRN (30 de marzo). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2031561
Puschmann, C. y Burgess, J. (2014a). The politics of Twitter Data. En Weller, K., Bruns, A., Burgess, J. Mahrt, M. y Puschmann, C. (eds.), Twitter and society (pp. 43-54). Nueva York: Peter Lang. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2206225
Puschmann, C. y Burgess, J. (2014b). Metaphors of big data. International Journal of Communication, 8(4), 1690-1709. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2169
Reading, A. y Notley, T. (2015). The materiality of globital memory: Bringing the cloud to earth. Continuum, 29(4), 511-521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2015.1051807
Sarikakis, K., Krug, C. y Rodriguez-Amat, J. R. (2017). Defining authorship in user-generated content: Copyright struggles in The Game of Thrones. New Media & Society, 19(4), 542-559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815612446
Scolari, C. A. (2015). Los ecos de McLuhan: ecología de los medios, semiótica e interfaces. Palabra Clave, 18(4), 1025-1056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2015.18.4.4
Scolari, C. y Rodriguez-Amat, J.-R. (2018). A Latin American approach to mediatization: Specificities and contributions to a global discussion about how the media shape contemporary societies. Communication Theory, 28, 131-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtx004
Sender, K. y Decherney, P. (2016). Stuart Hall lives: cultural studies in an age of digital media. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33(5), 381-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1244725
Shaw, A. (2017). Encoding and decoding affordances: Stuart Hall and interactive media technologies. Media, Culture y Society, 39(4), 592-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717692741
Silverstone, R. (1996). Televisión y vida cotidiana. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Valdebenitos Allendes, J. (2018). Un fantasma recorre la web. Aproximación crítica al trabajo digital y cibervigilancia. Revista F@ro, 1(27), 35-39. https://www.revistafaro.cl/index.php/Faro/article/view/541
Smith, G. J. (2020). The politics of algorithmic governance in the black box city. Big Data & Society, 7(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720933989
Stallman, R. (2002). Free software, free society: Selected essays of Richard M. Stallman. Lulu.com.
Stuart, T. (2021). Too little too late? An exploration and analysis of the inadequacies of antitrust law when regulating gafam data-driven mergers and the potential legal remedies available in the age of Big Data. European Competition Journal, 17(2), 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2021.1909234
Thatcher, J., Shears, A. y Eckert, J. (eds.) (2018). Thinking Big data in geography: New regimes, new research. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jinh_r_01381
Van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance y Society, 12, 197-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
Van Eeten, M. J. y Mueller, M. (2013). Where is the governance in Internet governance? New Media & Society, 15(5), 720-736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462850
Van Es, K. y Schäfer, M. T. (2017). The datafied society. Studying culture through data. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048531011
Verón, E. (1974). Pertinence [idéologique] du code. Degrés, 7/8, 1-13, Bruselas.
Verón, E. (1981). Construire l’événement. Les médias et l’accident de Three Mile Island. París: Editions de Minuit [Construir el acontecimiento. Los medios de comunicación masiva y el accidente en la central nuclear de Three Mile Island. Buenos Aires: Gedisa, 1983].
Verón, E. (1988). La semiosis social. Fragmentos de una teoría de la discursividad. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Verón, E. (2004). Fragmentos de un tejido [1979]. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Verón, E. (2019). Los públicos entre producción y recepción. Problemas para una teoría del reconocimiento. InMediaciones de la Comunicación, 14(1), 163-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2019.14.1.2891
Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30, 75-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2021 Palabra Clave
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Proposta de Política para Periódicos de Acesso Livre
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Esta revista e os seus artigos estão publicados com a licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Você tem o direito de compartilhar, copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato. Para que isto ocorra: você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas; você não pode usar o material para fins comerciais; e, se você remixar, transformar ou criar a partir do material, você não pode distribuir o material modificado.
