Participatory Storytelling Online: The Challenge of the Dialog Between Form and Content to Obtain Vibrant Settings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2019.22.1.3Keywords:
Cultural studies, narratives, storytelling, media swarm, roboticsAbstract
Cuento participativo en red: el reto del diálogo entre forma y contenido para obtener escenarios vibrantes
Conto participativo em rede: o desafio do diálogo entre forma e conteúdo para obter cenários vibrantes
This article aims to study storytelling in cyberspace within the radical shift that virtual communication, robotics and artificial intelligence imply. Based on a theoretical methodological approach, and through a comprehensive interdisciplinary literature review, the paper reflects on the particularities of the new digital communication setting and its impact on the ideas and creation of new types of stories. We start from the hypothesis that there is no appropriate dialog among computer programmers, neuroscientists and narrative specialists who act as hermetic and self-referential fields that produce interesting but parallel knowledge. The study highlights that programmed narrative only uses one-way action-response techniques from behavioral psychology and an exclusively exemplary narratology that repeats without innovating. As a conclusion, the article emphasizes the need to construct a new theoretical framework that matches the advances and drawbacks of the anthropotechnological literature. For this, we propose to change the paradigm and apply the rules derived from the continuators of formalism and the analysts of traditional storytelling structures. The article, as an original contribution, stresses the need to create vibrant settings through a creative initiative that introduces the use of new notions such as crowdsourcing, collective intelligence or robotic psychology into participatory storytelling online. This varied set of elements enables the creation of stories that progressively enhance the involvement of users and recover their active role.
Para citar este artículo / to reference this article / para citar este artigo
Perceval, J. M. y Tejedor-Calvo, S. (2019). Cuento participativo en red: el reto del diálogo entre forma y contenido para obtener escenarios vibrantes. Palabra Clave 22(1), e2213. DOI: 10.5294/pacla.2019.22.1.3
Downloads
References
Aarne, A. (1910). Verzeichnis der Märchenypen. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
Aarne, A. (1961). The types of the folktale: A classification and bibliography. Helsinki: The Finnish Academy of Science and Letters.
Alemany, J. (2007). Panchatantra. Barcelona: Paidós.
Arvidsson, A. (2005). Computer games as fiction and social interaction. Umeå: Umeå Universitet.
Bal, M. (2009). Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Baldock, P. (2006). The place of narrative in the early years curriculum: How the tale unfolds. Nueva York: Routledge.
Barthes, R. (1975). The pleasure of the text. Nueva York: Hill&Wang.
Bauman, R. (1986). Story, performance, and event: Contextual studies of oral narrative. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Berger, A. (1997). Narratives in popular culture, media, and everyday life. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Berger, A. (2002). Video games: A popular culture phenomenon. New Brunswick: Transaction.
Berger, A. (2003). Durkheim is dead! Sherlock Holmes is introduced to sociological theory. San Francisco: Altamira Press/Rowman & Littlefield.
Campbell, J. (1993). The hero with a thousand faces. Londres: Fontana Press.
Chomsky, N. (1999). Ideas and ideals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Duggan, A., Haase, D. y Callow, H. (2016). Folktales and fairy tales: Traditions and texts from around the world. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
Dundes, A. (1964). The morphology of north American indian Folktales. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
Gervás, P., Peinado, F., Lönneker-Rodman, B. y Meister, J. (2006). Narrative models: Narratology meets artificial intelligence. En International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Satellite Workshop: Toward Computational Models of Literary Analysis (pp. 44-51). Génova: LREC.
Gibson, J. (1979). The theory of affordances. Nueva Jersey: Hilldale.
Greimas, A. (1983). Structural semantics: An attempt at a method. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Haase, D. (ed.) (2008). The Greenwood Encyclopedia of Folktales and Fairy Tales. Londres: Greenwood Press.
Halliday, W. (2014). Folklore and Mythology. Indo-European Folk-Tales and Greek Legend. Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press.
Hesmondhalgh, D. (2013). Cultural industries. Londres: Sage.
Holbek, B. (1986). Interpretation of fairy tales. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
Holbek, B. (1992). On the comparative method in folklore research. Turku: Nordic Institute of Folklore.
Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456. doi: 10.1017/S0038038501000219
Jaidka, M. (2016). Narratives across borders. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Jenkins, H. (2007). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. Nueva York: New York University Press.
Jenkins, H. (2011, julio 31). Transmedia 202: Further reflections. Recuperado de http://henryjenkins.org/2011/08/defining_transmedia_further_re.html
Kennedy, J. (2007). Particle swarm optimization. Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, 1(1), 760-766. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_630
Kickmeier-Rust, M. D. y Dietrich, A. (2009). Emergent design: Serendipity in digital educational games. Graz: University of Graz.
Krohn, K. (1971). Folklore methodology. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelpia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Madsen, S. y Nielsen, L. (2009). Exploring persona-scenarios-using storytelling to create design ideas. En Human work interaction design: Usability in social, cultural and organizational contexts (pp. 57-66). Berlín: Springer.
Merton, R. K. y Barber, E. (2004). The travels and adventures of serendipity: A study in sociological semantics and the sociology of science. Nueva Jersey: Princenton University Press.
Monaci, S. (2008). Quality contents creation in a commons: Based peer production on line environment: The IT. Wikipedia Experience. En IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet (pp. 11-18). Friburgo: IADIS.
Monaci, S. (2016). Boosting creativity through digital disruption? The role of co-creation platforms in the media production field. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 11(1), 49-64. doi: 10.16997/wpcc.218
Nusz, A. (2012). The foundational structures behind Star Wars (Tesis de maestría, University of Louisville, Kentuchy, Estados Unidos).
Ogata, T. y Akimoto, T. (2016). Computational and cognitive approaches to narratology. Hersehey: IGI Global.
Paré, Z. (2016). L’Âge d’or de la robotique Japonaise. París: Les Belles Lettres.
Pata, K. (2011). Participatory design experiment: Storytelling Swarm in hybrid narrative ecosystem. En B. K. Daniel (ed.), A handbook of research on methods and techniques for studying virtual communities: Paradigms and phenomena (pp. 482-508). Nueva York: Hershey Information Science Reference.
Peltonen, M. y Wickström, M. (2014). 3D-prints and robots play a part in my story: Participatory learning action and content creation in a library maker space. En Libraries for children and young adults with literacy and reading. Lyon: IFLA WLIC.
Perceval, J. M. (2015). Historia mundial de la comunicación. Madrid: Cátedra.
Perceval, J. M. y Tejedor Calvo, S. (2006). El cuento multimedia interactivo. Comunicar, 26, 177-182. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=15802627
Perceval, J. M., Simelio, N. y Forga, M. (2013). Yo, tú, él: la desaparición de los pronombres en internet. Hacia la personalidad múltiple en red. En F. Sabés y J. J. Verón (eds.), Comunicación y la red: nuevas formas de periodismo (pp. 231-238). Huesca: Asociación de Periodistas de Aragón.
Phillips, A. (2012). A creator’s guide to transmedia storytelling: How to captivate and engage audiences across multiple platforms. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.
Piantelli, M. (1997). About the Ramayana Structure: Epics and fable. En Proceedings of the Ninth International Ramayana Conference (pp. 253-263). Turín: International Ramayana Conference.
Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of the folktale. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Propp, V. (1984). Theory and history of folklore. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Reinhardt, W., Varlemann, T., Matthias, M. y Wilke, A. (2010.) Modeling, obtaining and storing data from social media tools with Artefact-Actor-Networks. Paderborn: University of Paderborn.
Rooth, A. (1951). The cinderella cycle. Lund: Gleerups.
Rosenberg, L., Baltaxe, D. y Pescetelli, N. (2016). Crowds vs swarms, a comparison of intelligence. Swarm/Human Blended Intelligence Workshop. doi: 10.1109/SHBI.2016.7780278
Salvadori, M. L. y Asteriti, A. (2002). Apologizing to the ancient fable: Gianni Rodari and his influence on italian children’s literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Serebriakov, I. (1880). A few thoughts on the Katha Sarit Sagara. Nueva Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
Sidhar Wright, N. (2009). “Tom Cruise? Tarantino? E.T.?… Indian!” Innovation through imitation in the Cross-cultural Bollywood Remake. Recuperado de http://clublum.com/images/Scope-Cultural_Borrowings_Final%20clublum.pdf#page=206
Snyder, P. C. y Waite, J. (2010). Using transmedia storytelling techniques
to invigorate graphic communications programs. Visual Communications Journal, 50(1), 24-31. Recuperado de http://gceaonline.org/publications/visual-communications-journal/
Sreenivas, D. (2010). Structure of Narratives: Applying Propp’s folktale morphology to entertainment-education films. México: University of New Mexico.
Stewart, K. G. (2014). Blogs, books, & breadcrumbs: A case study of transmedial fairy tales. Provo: Brigham Young University.
Thompson, S. (1961). The types of the folktale: A classification and bibliography. Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.
Todorov, T. (1965). Teoría de la literatura, textos de los formalistas rusos. Buenos Aires: Signos.
Tomashevski, B. (1965). Thematics. En L. T. Lemon y J. R. Marion (eds.), Russian formalist criticism: Four essays. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Torrey, C., Fussell, S. y Kiesler, S. (2012). How a robot should give advice. En Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. Tokio: IEEE Press.
Vellar, A. (2009). Le industrie culturali ei pubblici partecipativi: dalle comunità di fan ai social media. Roma: Aracne.
Zipes, J. (2002). Breaking the magic spell: Radical theories of folk and fairy tales. Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky.
Zipes, J. (2006). Fairy tales and the art of subversion. Abingdon: Routledge.
Zipes, J. (2007). When dreams came true: Classical fairy tales and their tradition. Nueva York: Routledge.
Zlatar, Z. (1997). Approaches to the Ur-Mahabharata. Sydney Studies in Society and Culture, 15, 243-284. Recuperado de https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/SSSC/article/view/8011
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
