Barricades against Evictions: Coexistence of Short- and Long-term Frames in the Housing Movement on Facebook and Twitter

Ezequiel Ramón-Pinat

doi:10.5294/pacla.2024.27.2.3

Authors

Ezequiel Ramón-Pinat Author Autonomous University of Barcelona https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1050-6497

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2024.27.2.3

Keywords:

Social media, housing needs, right to housing, social movement, urban areas, social conflict

Abstract

Social movements fight to change society’s roots and challenge entrenched cultural frameworks. At the same time, however, they must attend to everyday activism and protests that constitute a clear and pragmatic mobilization goal. This article analyzes the case of a movement for decent housing on social media called Platform for Those Affected by Mortgages (PAH). This organization fights to guarantee universal access to housing, a recurrent problem in large cities. It grew in 2010 when the subprime mortgage crisis broke out in the United States. The bursting of the real estate bubble built up at that time had a global impact, pushing other markets. On the one hand, the movement has to change entrenched cognitive frameworks that say property must be bought and its loss is the individual’s responsibility. On the other hand, it must coordinate and try to gather as many people as possible to stop the evictions that occur every day. Twitter seems crucial for daily mobilization in this double logic, while Facebook allows for more complex narratives. The methodology used was a framing analysis of the content published on the organization’s official Facebook and Twitter accounts. Although these should be understood as overlapping layers, the movement is often trapped in a narrative that it does not want. By highlighting specific cases, it leads to an understanding that access to housing does not affect most of society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bennett, W. L. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The annals of the American academy of political and social science, 644(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428

Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor books.

Boulianne, S. & Theocharis, Y. (2018). Young people, digital media, and engagement: A meta-analysis of research. Social Science Computer Review, 38(2) 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318814190

Chadwick, A. (2007). Digital network repertoires and organizational hybridity. Political Communication, 24(3), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600701471666

Colau, A. (2011). Como se para un desahucio. Plataforma de Afectados por la Hipoteca. https://afectadosporlahipoteca.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/como-parar-desahucio_a-colau1.pdf

Colau, A., & Alemany, A. (2012). Mortgaged Lives: From the housing bubble to the right to housing. Journal of Aesthetics & Protest Press.

Crone, V., & Post, J. (2015). Reporting Revolution. Digital Journalism, 3(6), 871–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.990253

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Flesher Fominaya, C. (2015). Redefining the crisis/redefining democracy: mobilising for the right to housing in Spain’s PAH movement. South European Society and Politics, 20(4), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2015.1058216

Fuchs, C. (2011). Foundations of critical media and information studies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830864

Fuchs, C. (2018a). Digital demagogue: Authoritarian capitalism in the age of Trump and Twitter. Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt21215dw

Fuchs, C. (2018b). Socialising Antisocial Social Media. In J. Mair, T. Clark, N. Fowler, R. Snoddy, & R. Tait (Eds.), Antisocial Media: The Impact on Journalism and Society (pp. 58–63). Abramis Academic Publishing.

Fuchs, C., Hofkirchner, W., Schafranek, M., Raffl, C., Sandoval, M., & Bichler, R. (2010). Theoretical foundations of the web: Cognition, communication, and cooperation. Towards an understanding of Web 1.0, 2.0, 3.0. Future Internet, 2(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi2010041

Gerbaudo, P. (2017). The mask and the flag: Populism, citizenism and global protest. Oxford University Press.

Gerbaudo, P. (2019a). Del ciber-autonomismo al ciber-populismo: Una historia de la ideología del activismo digital. Defensa del Software Libre.

Gerbaudo, P. (2019b). The digital party: Political organisation and online democracy. Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv86dg2g

Gerbaudo, P. & Treré, E. (2015). In search of the ‘we’ of social media activism: Introduction to the special issue on social media and protest identities. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 865–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043319

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.

Hardt, M., & Negri, T. (2018). The Multiplicities within Capitalist Rule and the Articulation of Struggles. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 16(2), 440–448. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v16i2.1025

Howard, P. (2010). The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Information Technology and Political Islam. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199736416.001.0001

Kaun, A., & Uldam, J. (2018). Digital activism: After the hype. New Media & Society, 20(6), 2099–2106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817731924

Kim, S., & Weaver, D. (2002). Communication research about the Internet: A thematic meta-analysis. New media & society, 4(4), 518–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144402321466796

Kittur, A., Chi, E., Pendleton, B., Suh, B., & Mytkowicz, T. (2007). Power of the few vs. wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie. World Wide Web, 1(2), 19.

Kobayashi, T. (2010). Bridging social capital in online communities: Heterogeneity and social tolerance of online game players in Japan. Human Communication Research, 36(4), 546–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01388.x

Lobera, J., & Sampedro, V. (2014). La transversalidad del 15M entre la ciudadanía. In E. Serrano, A. Calleja-López, A. Monterde, & J. Toret (Eds.), 15MP2P. Una mirada transdisciplinar del 15M (pp. 470–489). UOC-IN3.

Lovink, G. (2004). Fibra Oscura: Rastreando la cultura crítica de Internet. Tecnos/Alianza.

Lovink, G. (2016). Redes sin causa: una crítica a las redes sociales. Editorial UOC.

Machado, J. (2007). Ativismo em rede e conexões identitárias: novas perspectivas para os movimentos sociais. Sociologias, (18), 248–285. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-45222007000200012

McAdam, D., McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (2008). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge University.

Mir, J., França, J., Macías, C., & Veciana, P. (2013). Fundamentos de la Plataforma de Afectados por la Hipoteca: activismo, asesoramiento colectivo y desobediencia civil no violenta. Educación Social: Revista de Intervención Socioeducativa, 55, 52–61.

Quijada, C. (2014). Estudiantes conectados y movilizados: El uso de Facebook en las protestas estudiantiles en Chile. Comunicar: Revista científica iberoamericana de comunicación y educación, 43(22), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.3916/C43-2014-02

Quintana, Y., & Tascón, M. (2012). Ciberactivismo: Las nuevas revoluciones de las multitudes conectadas. Los Libros de la Catarata.

Ramon-Pinat, E. (2022). The difficulties in spreading housing rights discourse in the face of ‘right now’ pragmatism on Twitter. Communication & Society, 35(2), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.35.2.299-311

Rieder, B. (2013). Studying Facebook via data extraction: The Netvizz application. In Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM web science conference (pp. 346–355). https://doi.org/10.1145/2464464.2464475

Rivas, A. (1988). El análisis de marcos: una metodología para el estudio de los movimientos sociales. In P. Ibarra & B. Tejerina (Eds.), Los movimientos sociales. Transformaciones políticas y cambio cultural. Editorial Trotta.

Romanos, E. (2014). Evictions, petitions and escraches: Contentious housing in austerity Spain. Social Movement Studies, 13(2), 296–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2013.830567

Sebastiani, L., Fernández, B., & García, R. (2016). Lotte per il diritto alla casa nello Stato spagnolo: la Plataforma de Afectados por la Hipoteca. Campagne, successi e alcune chiavi di riflessione. Interface: a journal for and about social movements, 8(2), 363–393.

Tàbara, J., Costejà i Florensa, M., & Van Woerden, F. (2004). Las culturas del agua en la prensa española. Los ‘marcos culturales’ en la comunicación sobre el Plan Hidrológico Nacional. Papers: Revista de sociologia, (73), 153–179. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v73n0.1112

Treré, E. (2019). Hybrid media activism: Ecologies, imaginaries, algorithms. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315438177

Treré, E., & Cargnelutti, D. (2014). Movimientos sociales, redes sociales y Web 2.0: El caso del Movimiento por la Paz con Justicia y Dignidad. Comunicación y Sociedad, 27(1), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.27.36010

Tufekci, Z. (2014). Engineering the public: Big data, surveillance and computational politics. First Monday, 19(7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i7.4901

Van Dijk, T. A. (2020). Critical review of framing studies in social movement research [unpublished]. Centre of Discourse Studies.

Walgrave, S., Bennett, W. L., Van Laer, J., & Breunig, C. (2011). Multiple engagements and network bridging in contentious politics: Digital media use of protest participants. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 16(3), 325–349. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.16.3.b0780274322458wk