Sentimentos de ódio diante de fotografias racializadas: resposta emocional e comportamental de adultos nas redes sociais
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2025.28.1.6Palavras-chave:
discursos de odio, xenofobia, racismo, fotografías, imágenes, redes socialesResumo
Os preconceitos e as atitudes xenófobas são esquemas cognitivos que moldam as emoções e o comportamento. Eles emergem mais profusamente no ecossistema da mídia digital e são articulados como discurso de ódio, especialmente por meio da emissão de comentários nas redes sociais, atraídos pela presença de fotografias. Assim, o objetivo geral deste estudo é explorar a resposta emocional que os adultos têm às imagens de pessoas racializadas e não racializadas, a fim de relacioná-la à probabilidade de emitir mensagens negativas em espaços como as redes sociais. Em resumo, o objetivo é entender o que essas imagens provocam no público digital e que emoção os leva a se tornarem propagadores de ódio. Para isso, 103 participantes espanhóis (X idade = 40,32) foram recrutados por meio do Mechanical Turk (MTurk), aos quais foram mostradas 46 imagens, juntamente com as escalas pictográficas para avaliar a resposta emocional (Self-Assessment Manikin). Eles também foram questionados sobre a probabilidade de escreverem um comentário e se ele seria positivo ou negativo. Os resultados mostraram diferenças significativas entre as categorias fotográficas na resposta emocional e na probabilidade de postar um comentário negativo, com imagens de pessoas racializadas sendo associadas a um risco maior. O padrão emocional daqueles que indicaram alta probabilidade de postar um comentário negativo foi identificado como medo nas imagens negativas de pessoas racializadas e ódio nas imagens positivas. Esses resultados contribuem para a caracterização emocional dos emissores de discursos de ódio na mídia digital e nas redes sociais, especificamente aqueles relacionados a atitudes xenófobas.
Downloads
Referências
Adler, N. E., Boyce, T., Chesney, M. A., Cohen, S., Folkman, S., Kahn, R. L. y Syme, S. L. (1994). Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient. American Psychologist, 49(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.49.1.15
Aguerri, J. C. y Miró-Llinares, F. (2023). ¿Comunicación ofensiva y de odio o desinformación programada? IDP: Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política, 37, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.7238/idp.v0i37.397192
Backs, R. W., Da Silva, S. P. y Han, K. (2005). A comparison of younger and older adults’ Self-Assessment Manikin ratings of affective pictures. Experimental Aging Research, 31(4), 421-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610730500206808
Berger, J. (2011). Arousal increases social transmission of information. Psychological Science, 22(7), 891-893. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611413294
Bliuc, A. M., Faulkner, N., Jakubowicz, A. y McGarty, C. (2018). Online networks of racial hate: A systematic review of 10 years of research on cyber-racism. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.026
Bonilla-Silva, E. (1997). Rethinking racism: Toward a structural interpretation. American Sociological Review, 62(3), 465-480. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657316
Brader, T., Valentino, N. A. y Suhay, E. (2008). What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 959-978. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00353.x
Brown, L. M., Bradley, M. M. y Lang, P. J. (2006). Affective reactions to pictures of ingroup and outgroup members. Biological Psychology, 71(3), 303-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.06.003
Bynion, T. M. y Feldner, M. T. (2017). Self-Assessment Manikin. En V. Zeigler-Hill y T. K. Shackelford (eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_77-1
Cáceres Zapatero, M.ª D., Brändle, G. y Ruiz San-Román, J. A. (2015). Hacia la construcción de una ciudadanía digital. Prisma Social, 15, 643-684. https://www.isdfundacion.org/publicaciones/revista/numeros/15/secciones/abierta/pdf/a_06_participacion-empoderamiento_643-684.pdf
Carlson, C. R. y Cousineau, L. S. (2020). Are you sure you want to view this community? Exploring the ethics of reddit’s quarantine practice. Journal of Media Ethics, 35(4), 202-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2020.1819285
Carver, C. S. y Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: a control-process view. Psychological Review, 97(1), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.19
Castillo Valero, C. y Gil Quintana, J. (2018). Los memes en la construcción del discurso del odio en la red. En C. Castillo Valero y J. Gil Quintana (coords.), Comunicación y desarrollo en la sociedad digital: Nuevos discursos y viejos valores del poder cultural (pp. 11-31). Egregius. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1d-FbYd8RC4GNvZ9H3d5FCyx9iiW34HGf/view
Cea D’Ancona, M. Á. (2009). La compleja detección del racismo y la xenofobia a través de encuestas: Un paso adelante en su medición. Reis: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 125(1), 13-45. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.125.13
Cividanes-Álvarez, A. y Rolán, X. M. (2023). El discurso de odio en Instagram: Un análisis de las mujeres famosas en España. Journal of Digital Media & Interaction, 6(14), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.34624/jdmi.v6i14.32029
Cosmides, L. y Tooby, J. (2000). Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. En J. M. Haviland-Jones y M. Lewis (eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 91-115). Guilford. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_516
Cottrell, C. A. y Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: Asociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 770-789. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770
Cortina, A. (2017). Aporofobia, el rechazo al pobre. Un desafío para la democracia. Paidós.
De Bruyne, L., De Clercq, O. y Hoste, V. (2020). An emotional mess! deciding on a framework for building a Dutch emotion-annotated corpus. En Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, May 11-16, 2020, Marseille, France (pp. 1643-1651). https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/dc2e58motoM36
Echevarría, A., Villarreal, M., Garaigordovil, M. T. y González, J. L. (1995). Psicología social del prejuicio y del racismo. Centro de Estudios Ramón Areces.
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1993). Biología del comportamiento humano. Alianza.
Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. En T. Dalgleish y M. J. Power (eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 45-60). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013494.ch3
Ekman, M. (2019). Anti-immigration and racist discourse in social media. European Journal of Communication, 34(6), 606-618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323119886151
Ekman, P. y Davidson, R. J. (eds.) (1994). The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions. Oxford University Press.
ElSherief, M., Nilizadeh, S., Nguyen, D., Vigna, G. y Belding, E. (2018). Peer to peer hate: Hate speech instigators and their targets. En Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.15038
Erjavec, K. y Kovačič, M. P. (2012). “You don’t understand, this is a new war!”: Analysis of hate speech in news web sites’ comments. Mass Communication and Society, 15(6), 899-920. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.619679
Fischer, A., Halperin, E., Canetti, D. y Jasini, A. (2018). Why we hate. Emotion Review, 10(4), 309-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917751229
Fuentes-Lara, C. y Arcila-Calderón, C. (2023). El discurso de odio islamófobo en las redes sociales: Un análisis de las actitudes ante la islamofobia en Twitter. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 14(1), 225-240. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.23044
Gagliardone, I., Gal, D., Alves, T. y Martínez, G. (2015). Countering online hate speech. Unesco. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000233231
George, D. y Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (16.ª ed.), Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765
George, D. y Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics Processes for Mac. En IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step A Simple Guide and Reference (16.ª ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765
Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E. y Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of mechanical turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1002/BDM.1753
Harrison, D. W. y Gorelczenko, P. M. (1990). Functional asymmetry for facial affect perception in high and low hostile men and women. International Journal of Neuroscience, 55(2-4), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207459008985954
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1037/10628-000
Henninger, F., Shevchenko, Y., Mertens, U.K., Kieslich, P. J. y Hilbig, B. E. (2021). lab.js: A free, open, online study builder. Behavioral Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01283-5
Hewstone, M. y Jaspars, J. (1983). A re‐examination of the roles of consensus, consistency and distinctiveness: Kelley’s cube revisited. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22(1), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1983.tb00564.x
IAB Spain. (2023). Estudio de redes sociales 2023. https://iabspain.es/estudio/estudio-de-redes-sociales-2023/
Keib, K., Espina, C., Lee, Y. I., Wojdynski, B. W., Choi, D. y Bang, H. (2018). Picture this: The influence of emotionally valenced images, on attention, selection, and sharing of social media news. Media Psychology, 21(2), 202-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1378108
Kurdi, B., Lozano, S. y Banaji, M. R. (2017). Introducing the open affective standardized image set (OASIS). Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 457-470. https://doi.org/10.3758/S13428-016-0715-3
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M. y Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report A-4. The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M. y Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual, Technical Report A-8. University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.
Lange, K., Kühn, S. y Filevich, E. (2015). Correction: “Just Another Tool for Online Studies” (JATOS): An easy solution for setup and management of web werverssupporting online studies. PLOS ONE, 10(7), e0134073. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134073
Lara-Salinas, A. M. (2007). Migraciones internacionales, seguridad y xenofobia: Los límites del modelo francés de integración. Oasis, 12, 209-227. https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/oasis/article/view/2419/2059
Levin, J. y McDevitt, J. (2008). Hate crimes. En L. Kurtz (ed.), Encyclopedia of violence, peace & conflict (2.ª ed.) (pp. 915-922). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373985-8.00075-1
Litman, L., Robinson, J. y Abberbock, T. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433-442. https://doi.org/10.3758/S13428-016-0727-Z
Liu, Y., Ding, Y., Li, C., Cheng, J., Song, R., Wan, F. y Chen, X. (2020). Multi-channel EEG-based emotion recognition via a multi-level features guided capsule network. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 123, 103927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103927
Luminet, O., Bouts, P., Delie, F., Manstead, A. y Rimé, B. (2000). Social sharing of emotion following exposure to a negatively valenced situation. Cognition & Emotion, 14(5), 661-688. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930050117666
Mackie, D. M., Devos, T. y Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 602-616. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.602
Mahmoudi, A., Jemielniak, D. y Ciechanowski, L. (2024). Echo chambers in online social networks: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 12, 9594-9620. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3353054
Matamoros-Fernández, A. y Farkas, J. (2021). Racism, hate speech, and social media: A systematic review and critique. Television & New Media, 22(2), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420982230
Merhej, R. (2024). Prejudice in children and extremism in adults: Intriguing mindset convergences. Social Science Information, 63(1), 47-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184231220227
Miró Llinares, F. (2017). Cometer delitos en 140 caracteres: El derecho penal ante el odio y la radicalización en Internet. Marcial Pons.
Naciones Unidas. (s. f.). ¿Qué es el discurso de odio? https://www.un.org/es/hate-speech/understanding-hate-speech/what-is-hate-speech
Plutchik, R. (2003). Emotions and life: Perspectives from psychology, biology, and evolution. American Psychological Association.
Rand, D. G. (2012). The promise of Mechanical Turk: How online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 299, 172-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.03.004
Räsänen, P., Hawdon, J., Holkeri, E., Keipi, T., Näsi, M. y Oksanen, A. (2016). Targets of online hate: Examining determinants of victimization among young finnishfacebookusers. Violence and Victims, 31(4), 708-725. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00079
Reichelmann, A., Hawdon, J., Costello, M., Ryan, J., Blaya, C., Llorent, V., Oksanen, A., Räsänen, P. y Zych, I. (2020). Hate knows no boundaries: Online hate in six nations. Deviant Behavior, 42(9) 1100-1111. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2020.1722337
Rieger, D., Kümpel, A. S., Wich, M., Kiening, T. y Groh, G. (2021). Assessing the extent and types of hate speech in fringe communities: A case study of alt-right communities on 8chan, 4chan, and Reddit. Social Media+ Society, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211052906
Ródenas, G. (2013). Capturar es compartir: Filosofía, redes sociales y fotografía 2.0. Enrahonar: Quaderns de Filosofia, 50, 59-72. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/enrahonar/v50n0.116
Segado-Boj, F., Díaz-Campo, J. y Navarro-Sierra, N. (2020). Emociones y difusión de noticias sobre el cambio climático en redes sociales: Influencia de hábitos, actitudes previas y usos y gratificaciones en universitarios. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 75, 245-269. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1425
Shaked, D., Williams, M., Evans, M. K. y Zonderman, A. B. (2016). Indicators of subjective social status: Differential associations across race and sex. SSM-Population Health, 2, 700-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSMPH.2016.09.009
Singh-Manoux, A., Marmot, M. G. y Adler, N. E. (2005). Does subjective social status predict health and change in health status better than objective status? Psychosomatic Medicine, 65(6), 578-585. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000188434.52941.a0
Solé i Puig, C., Parella Rubio, S., Alarcón Alarcón, A., Bergalli, V. y Gibert Badia, F. (2000). El impacto de la inmigración en la sociedad receptora. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 90, 131-157. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.90.131
SPARQtools. (2007). MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status - Adult Version. https://sparqtools.org/mobility-measure/macarthur-scale-of-subjective-social-status-adult-version/
Svendsen, L. (2007). A philosophy of fear. Reaktion books.
Torre Cantalapiedra, E. (2019). Migración, racismo y xenofobia en internet: Análisis del discurso de usuarios contra los migrantes haitianos en prensa digital mexicana. Revista Pueblos y Fronteras Digital, 14, e401. https://doi.org/10.22201/cimsur.18704115e.2019.v14.401
Van Dijk, T. (2007). Discurso racista. En J. J. Igartua y C. Muñiz (coords.), Medios de comunicación, inmigración y sociedad (pp. 9-16). Universidad de Salamanca.
Zeki, S. y Romaya, J. P. (2008). Neural correlates of hate. PLOS ONE, 3(10), e3556. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003556
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 María Vélez-Coto, Noemí Morejón-Llamas, María Luisa Cárdenas-Rica
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. Proposta de Política para Periódicos de Acesso Livre
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Esta revista e os seus artigos estão publicados com a licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Você tem o direito de compartilhar, copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato. Para que isto ocorra: você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas; você não pode usar o material para fins comerciais; e, se você remixar, transformar ou criar a partir do material, você não pode distribuir o material modificado.