Aproximación técnico-social al entendimiento de la disrupción digital

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2019.22.3.1

Palavras-chave:

Tecnologia, sociedade, simbolismo social, construção de tecnologia, construção social de tecnologia, COST

Resumo

Socio-technical approach to the understanding of the digital disruption

Abordagem técnico-social para a compreensão da ruptura digital

Sociedade e tecnologia transformam-se mutuamente em uma interação constante que gera uma série de hibridizações. O avanço da tecnologia não pode ser entendido sem compreender as profundas mudanças sociais, políticas e econômicas que a humanidade enfrenta; mas também, não é possível explicar às sociedades sem as mudanças produzidas pela própria tecnologia, uma vez que ela é instalada e disseminada dentro das comunidades. Nesta editorial, propõe-se uma abordagem técnico-social para entender a interação entre tecnologia e sociedade através da pesquisa acadêmica.

Cómo citar esta editorial / How to cite this editorial / Para citar nesta editorial

García-Perdomo, V. (2019). Aproximación técnico-social al entendimiento de la disrupción digital. Palabra Clave22(3), e2231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2019.22.3.1

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Bijker, W. E. (1997). The social construction of fluorescent lighting, or how an artifact was invented in its diffusion stage. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology, building society: Studies of sociotechnological change (Second ed., pp. 75–102). Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.

Bijker, W. E. (2012). The social construction of Bakelite: Toward a theory of invention. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (Anniversary). Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.

Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (2012). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (Anniversary). Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.

Douglas, S. (1987). Inventing American Broadcasting, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Klein, H. K., & Kleinman, D. L. (2002). The Social Construction of Technology: Structural considerations. Science, Technology & Human Values, 27(1), 28–52. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1177/016224390202700102

Howard, P. N. (2002). Network Ethnography and the Hypermedia Organization: New Media, New Organizations, New Methods. New Media & Society, 4, 550–574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/146144402321466813

Latour, B. (2005). Ressembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

Law, J., & Bijker, W. E. (1997). Postscript: Technology, stability, and social theory. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology, building society. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.

Lewis, S.C. & Westlund, O. (2015) Actors, Actants, Audiences, and Activities in Cross-Media News Work, Digital Journalism, 3:1, 19-37, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.927986

Mosco, Vicent (2004). The Digital Sublime: Myth, Power, and Cyberspace. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Plesner, U. (2009). An Actor-network perspective on changing work practices: Communication technologies as actants in newswork. Journalism 10(5): 604–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884909106535

Schmitz, A., & Domingo, D. (2010). Innovation processes in online newsrooms as actor-networks and communities of practice. New Media & Society, 12(7), 1156–1171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809360400

Streeter, T. (2010). The Net Effect: Romanticism, capitalism and the Internet, New York: NYU Press

Publicado

2019-06-21

Como Citar

García Perdomo, V. (2019). Aproximación técnico-social al entendimiento de la disrupción digital. Palabra Clave, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2019.22.3.1

Edição

Seção

Apresentação