Global political narratives and subjectivities in digital media: analysis of the #SinMiedo campaign
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2025.28.1.9Keywords:
Cyberspace, social networks, political analysis, subjectivities, narrativesAbstract
This article explores how digital platforms have become central to the creation and dissemination of political narratives that influence the construction of individual and collective identities. Using a mixed approach that combines critical theory and discourse analysis, this paper examines the triad of cyberspace, social media, and international relations. Utilizing data science-based collection and analysis techniques, it analyses social listening on the #SinMiedo case. The findings show that the expansion of digital technologies has led to greater complexity in political analysis and international relations, especially in the elicitation of feelings of social dissatisfaction. While cyberspace offers opportunities for inclusive political participation, it also poses significant challenges to social cohesion and democratic stability. The article reveals how the interplay between political narrative and subjectivity in cyberspace redefines traditional power structures, favouring new non-state actors in shaping public opinion.
Downloads
References
Alba Vega, C. (2020). La transnacionalización del mundo social: Espacios sociales más allá de las sociedades nacionales. Foro Internacional, 60(3), 1207-1221. https://doi.org/10.24201/fi.v60i3.2777
Arias Gómez, D. H. (2011). Subjetividades contemporáneas. Ignis, 3-4, 38-48. https://doi.org/10.52143/2711-029x.76
Asencio-Guillén, A. (2018). El ciberespacio como sistema y entorno social: Una propuesta teórica a partir de Niklas Luhmann. Communication & Society, 31(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.31.35725
Broman, M. M., Finckenberg-Broman, P. y Bird, S. (2024). Cyberspace outlaws: Coding the online world. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 37, 1153-1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10100-4
Caldevilla Domínguez, D. (2010). Las redes sociales: Tipología, uso y consumo de las redes 2.0 en la sociedad digital actual. Documentación de las Ciencias de la Información, 33, 45-68. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/DCIN/article/download/DCIN1010110045A/18656
Castells, M. (2015). Redes de indignación y esperanza: Los movimientos sociales en la era de internet. Alianza.
Chaves Guerrero, L. M.ª y Jurado Vásquez, H. (2019). El ciberespacio, fuente de control y vigilancia para los ciudadanos. Perspectivas en Inteligencia, 11(20), 347-357. https://doi.org/10.47961/2145194x.39
Chia-yi Lee, E. (2019, 31 de marzo). Thinking cyber-subjectivity: Ideology and the subject. https://web.archive.org/web/20160103053908/http://www.isoc.org/inet96/proceedings/e3/e3_4.htm
Costigan, S. S. y Perry, J. (eds.) (2012). Cyberspaces and global affairs. Ashgate Publishing.
Creswell, J. W. y Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
Crilley, R., Manor, I. y Bjola, C. (2020). Visual narratives of global politics in the digital age: an introduction. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 33(5), 628-637. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2020.1813465
Cristiano, F. (2022). The blurring politics of cyber conflict: A critical study of the digital in Palestine and beyond. Lund University. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID4169767_code4211804.pdf?abstractid=4169767&mirid=1
Cristiano, F., Kurowska, X., Stevens, T., Hurel, L. M., Fouad, N. S., Cavelty, M. D., Broeders, D., Liebetrau, T. y Shires, J. (2024). Cybersecurity and the politics of knowledge production: Towards a reflexive practice. Journal of Cyber Policy, 8(3), 331-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2023.2287687
De León, H. (2012). La subjetividad: Un arrollo insalvable. Educación Física y Deporte, 31(1), 893-900. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.efyd.12669
Devia, E. (2024). Protesta Social MW (All Languages). Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25287835.v2
Edwards, P. N. (1994). Cyberpunks in cyberspace: The politics of subjectivity in the computer age. Sociological Review, 42(1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1994.tb03410.x
Foucault, M. (1968). Las palabras y las cosas: Una arqueología de las ciencias humanas. Siglo XXI.
Galeano, S. (2022, 28 enero). El número de usuarios de internet en el mundo crece un 4% y roza los 5.000 millones (2022). Marketing 4 Ecommerce. https://marketing4ecommerce.net/usuarios-de-internet-mundo/
Guerrero Vega, R. (2017). Redes sociales: Riesgos y amenazas. Cuaderno Jurídico y Político, 2(7), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.5377/cuadernojurypol.v2i7.11006
Guzmán Ríos, J. C. (1995). Tecnologías del yo. Perspectivas Docentes, 16. https://doi.org/10.19136/pd.a0n16.664
Harcourt, W. y Calle, X. A. (2022). Embodying cyberspace: Making the personal political in digital places. En W. Harcourt, K. van den Berg, C. Dupuis y J. Gaybor (eds.), Gender, development and social change (pp. 83-112). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82654-3_5
Jasso-Peña, F. de J., Gudiño-Paredes, S. y Tamez-Solis, J. P. (2019). Centennials, ciudadanos globales y digitales. Praxis, 15(1), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.21676/23897856.2981
Kamruzzaman, M. M. (2022). Impact of social media on geopolitics and economic growth: Mitigating the risks by developing artificial intelligence and cognitive computing tools. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7988894
Luke, T. W. y Toulouse, C. (1998). The politics of cyberspace: A new political science reader. Routledge.
Lupovici, A. (2022). Ontological security, cyber technology, and states’ responses. European Journal of International Relations, 29(1), 153-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661221130958
Manjikian, M. M. (2010). From global village to virtual battlespace: The colonizing of the internet and the extension of realpolitik. International Studies Quarterly, 54(2), 381-401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00592.x
Marini, G. (2020). Gullo, Marcelo (2018). Relaciones internacionales. Una teoría crítica desde la periferia sudamericana. Cupea: Cuadernos de Política Exterior Argentina, 128, 101-103. https://doi.org/10.35305/cc.vi128.32
Mayer, M., de Scalzi, N., Martino, L. y Chiarugi, I. (2013). International politics in the digital age: Power diffusion or power concentration. En Paper review and adaptation of the first version presented by the authors in the XXVIIth SISP Conference. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4470.0886
McBeath, G. B. y Webb, S. A. (1996). Cities, subjectivity and cyberspace. En S. Westwood y J. Williams (eds.), Imagining cities: Scripts, signs and memories. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203397350
McNair, B. (2016). Communication and political crisis: Media, politics and governance in a globalized public sphere. Peter Lang Publishing.
Megele, C. (2017). Online identity, digital citizenship and boundaries. En Safeguarding children and young people online: A guide for practitioners (pp. 25-46). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.56687/9781447331834-006
Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. Verso.
Muñoz Aguirre, R. (2021). Relaciones internacionales y geopolítica, transversales a la seguridad y defensa nacionales. Revista de las Fuerzas Armadas, 258, 75-84. https://doi.org/10.25062/0120-0631.411
Ochoa, C. S., Gadinger, F. y Yildiz, T. (2020). Surveillance under dispute: Conceptualising narrative legitimation politics. European Journal of International Security, 6(2), 210-232. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2020.23
Ördén, H. (2021). Securitizing cyberspace: Protecting political judgment. Journal of International Political Theory, 18(3), 375-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/17550882211046426
Ramos, F. (2022, 7 de junio). El impacto y significado de ‘Canción sin miedo’ de Vivir Quintana: El nacimiento de un himno. Univision. https://www.univision.com/entretenimiento/cultura-pop/vivir-quintana-cantautora-cancion-sin-miedo
Ricoeur, P. (1999). Historia y narratividad. Paidós.
Ricoeur, P. (2003). El conflicto de las interpretaciones. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Robles Carrillo, M. (2016). El ciberespacio: Presupuestos para su ordenación jurídico-internacional. Revista Chilena de Derecho y Ciencia Política, 7(1), 11-56. https://doi.org/10.7770/rchdcp.v1i1.1025
Rodríguez Rincón, Y. y Mora Lemus, G. (eds.) (2016). Antonio Gramsci: Subjetividades y saberes sociales. Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Rybas, N. y Gajjala, R. (2007). Developing cyberethnographic research methods for understanding digitally mediated identities. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-8.3.282
Shen, Y. (2016). Cyber sovereignty and the governance of global cyberspace. Chinese Political Science Review, 1(1), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-016-0002-6
Sierra Caballero, F. (2020). Ciberactivismo y nuevos movimientos urbanos: La producción del nuevo espacio público en la política contemporánea. Perspectivas de la Comunicación, 13(1), 177-202. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-48672020000100177
Toffler, A. (1979). The third wave. Bantam.
Valori, G. E. (2021, 16 de agosto). Cyberspace and world politics. Modern Diplomacy. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2021/08/13/cyberspace-and-world-politics/
Vara-Horna, A. (2012). Desde la idea hasta la sustentación: Siete pasos para una tesis exitosa. Un método efectivo para las ciencias empresariales. Universidad de San Martín de Porres. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2238.4080
Villarroel Peña, Y. U. (2018). Historiografía y relaciones internacionales en América Latina: Entre la rebeldía autonomista y la sumisión occidentalista. Relaciones Internacionales, 37, 143-171. https://doi.org/10.15366/relacionesinternacionales2018.37.006
Webb, S. A. (1998). Visions of excess: Cyberspace, digital technologies and new cultural politics. Information, Communication & Society, 1(1), 46-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691189809358953
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Emerson David Devia Acevedo
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.