Between the Ecology and Epistemology of Platformized Life: Embodiment, Interpassivity, and Premediation in Communication Processes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2024.27.4.10Keywords:
Embodied cognition, interpassivity, affordance, media ecology, premediationAbstract
Este artigo pretende apresentar uma fenomenologia das relações com, através e entre os média digitais num contexto de cultura plataformizada. Analisando um conjunto de práticas sociais mediadas pelas tecnologias digitais, esboça-se a reconfiguração de um novo campo de experiências propedêuticas à formação de novos habitus cognitivos e percetivos. Para a compreensão desse novo cenário sociotécnico, mostra-se a potencialidade heurística de uma metodologia analítica baseada na articulação entre as categorias de media ecology, material engagement e affordance. A complementaridade desses três prismas interpretativos revela-se pertinente no contexto da crítica cultural à plataformização das identidades, dos dispositivos de poder computacional, dos processos de valorização social e da epistemologia que lhes é subjacente.
Downloads
References
Andrejevic, M. (2008). Watching Television Without Pity: The Productivity of Online Fans. Television & New Media, 9(1), 24-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476407307241
Attali, J. (2015). Peut-on prévoir l’avenir? Ed Fayard.
Baldi, V. (2017). Más allá de la sociedad algorítmica y automatizada. Para una reapropiación crítica de la Cultura Digital. (OBS*) Observatorio, 11(3), 186-198. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS11320171093
Baldi, V. (2018) A construção viral da realidade: ciberpopulismos e polarização dos públicos em rede. (OBS*) Observatório, 12(5), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS12520181420
Beer, D. (2016). Metric Power. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55649-3
Bourdieu, P. (1983). La distinzione. Critica sociale del gusto. Il Mulino
Bucher, T. e Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. Em J. Burgess, A. Marwick e T. Poell. The sage handbook of social media (pp. 233-253). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066
Cabitza, F., Campagner, A. e Simone, C. (2021). The need to move away from agential-AI: Empirical investigations, useful concepts and open issues. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 155, 102696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102696
Carbone, M. (2021). Da corpi con protesi a corpi come “quasi-protesi”?. Ágalma, 40. Mimesis (pp. 28-35).
Carbone, M. e Lingua, G. (2023). Toward an anthropology of screens: Showing and hiding, exposing and protecting. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30816-1
Cardoso, G. (2023). A Comunicação da comunicação. As pessoas são a mensagem. Mundos Sociais.
Corbin, A. (1998). Mai 68. Avenir d’une revolte. Magazine Littéraire, 365.
Crary, J. (2015). 24/7. O Capitalismo tardio e os fins do sono. Antígona.
Crary, J. (2023). Terra arrasada. Além da era digital, rumo a um mundo pós-capitalista. Ubu.
Dean, J. (2010). Blog theory: Feedback and capture in the circuits of drive. Polity Press Cambridge.
Empoli, G. (2023). Os engenheiros do caos. Gradiva.
Finn, E. (2017). What algorithms want: Imagination in the age of computing. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262035927.001.0001
Fisher, M. (2021). Realismo capitalista. Não haverá alternativa? VS.
Floridi, L. (2015). The onlife manifesto. Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. Spinger. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6
Gabielkov, M., Ramachandran, A., Chaintreau, A. e Legout, A. (2016). Social clicks: What and who gets read on Twitter? SIGMETRICS’16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGMETRICS International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Science, 179-192. https://doi.org/10.1145/2896377.2901462
Gehlen, A. (1960). A alma na era da técnica. Livros do Brasil.
Gell, A. (1998). Art and Agency. An Anthropological Theory. Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198280132.001.0001
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin.
Glenski, M., Weninger T. e Volkova S. (2018). Identifying and Understanding User Reactions to Deceptive and Trusted Social News Sources. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P18-2029
Greenfield, A. (2017). Radical Technologies: The Design of Everyday Life. Verso.
Grusin, R. (2010). Premediation: Affect and Mediality After 9/11. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230275270
Hari, J. (2022). Stolen focus: Why you can’t pay attention. Bloomsbury.
Harris, T. (2016). How Technology is Hijacking Your Mind — from a Magician and Google Design Ethicist. https://medium.com/thrive-global/how-technology-hijacks-peoples-minds-from-a-magician-and-google-s-design-ethicist-56d62ef5edf3
Hildebrandt, M. (2020). Code Driven Law. Scaling the Past and Freezing the Future. Em C. Markou, C. e S. Deakin (eds.), Is Law Computable? Critical Perspectives on Law and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 67-84). Hart Publishers.
Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and Technology: From the telephone to the Internet. Polity.
Ihde, D. e Malafouris, L. (2019). Homo faber revisited: Postphenomenology and Material Engagement Theory. Em Philosophy and Technology, 32, 195-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0321-7
Kozyreva, A., Wineburg, S., Lewandowsky, S. e Hertwig, R. (2023). Critical Ignoring as a Core Competence for Digital Citizens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 32(1), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221121570
James, W. (1904). The principles of psychology (v. 2). Henry Holt & Company.
Larkin, B. (2013). The Politics and Poetics of Infraestructre. Annual Review of Antropology, 42, 327-343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522
Latour, B. (2015). Face à Gaïa: Huit conférences sur le nouveau régime climatique. La Découverte. https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.latou.2015.01
Leder Mackley, K. e Jewitt, C. (2022). Sociotechnical imaginaries of remote personal touch before and during COVID-19: An analysis of UK newspapers. New Media & Society, 268, 4361-4389. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221113922
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. McGraw Hill.
Malafouris, L. (2013) How Things Shape the Mind. A Theory of Material Engagement. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9476.001.0001
Markham, A. N. (2021). Echolocation as theory of digital sociality. Convergence, 27(6), 1558-1570. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 13548565211047158
Mauss, M. (1936). Les techniques du corps. Journal de Psychologie, XXXII, N. 3-4.
McVeigh-Schultz, J. e Baym, N. K. (2015). Thinking of you: Vernacular affordance in the context of the microsocial relationship app, couple. Social Media + Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604649
Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. PublicAffairs
Nagy, P., e Neff, G. (2015). Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media + Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603385
Newen, A., De Bruin, L. e Gallagher, S. (2018). The Oxford Handbook 4E Cognition. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ oxfordhb/9780198735410.001.0001
Norman, D. (1990). The Design of Everyday Things. Doubleday Business.
Orwell, G. (1958). The road to Wigan Pier. Harcourt, Brace.
Pariser, E. (2011). O filtro invisível. O que a internet está escondendo de você. Zahar.
Pfaller, R. (2017). Interpassivity: The Aesthetics of Delegated Enjoyment. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474422925.001.0001
Papacharissi, Z. (2014), Affective Publics. Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001
Perniola, M. (1991). Del sentire. Einaudi
Perniola, M. (2009). Miracoli e traumi della comunicazione. Einaudi.
Petit, V. (2013). Vocubalaire d’Ars Industrialis. Em B. Stiegler (ed.), Pharmacologie du Front national (pp. 369-441). Flammarion.
Poell, T., Brooke, D. B. e Duffy, E. (2021). Platforms and Cultural Production. Polity.
Postman, N. (1979). Teaching as a Conserving Activity. Dalcorte Press.
Reuters Institute (2023). Digital News Report 2022. Oxford University.
Romele, A. (2019). Digital Hermeneutics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429331893
Robins, D. e Holmes, J. (2008). Aesthetics and credibility in web site design. Information Processing and Management, 44, 386-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.02.003
Sadin, E. (2020). L’ère de l’individu tyran. La fin d’un monde comun. Èditionne Grasset & Fasquelle.
Savulich, G, Thorp, E, Piercy, T, Peterson, KA, Pickard, JD e Sahakian, BJ (2019). Improvements in Attention Following Cognitive Training with the Novel “Decoder” Game on an iPad. Front. Behav. Neurosci., 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00002
Simondon, G. (1958). Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Aubier.
Söderberg, J. e Maxigas, (2022). Resistance to the Current: The Dialectics of Hacking. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13466.001.0001
Stiegler, B. (2014). Digital studies: Organologie des savoirs et technologies de la connaissance. FYP Editions.
Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life. Biology, phenomenology and the sciences of the mind. The Belkanp Press of Harward University Press.
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
Uexküll, J. Von. (1982). Dos animais e dos homens: Digressões pelos seus mundos próprios. Doutrina do Significado. Livros do Brasil.
Varela, F. J. (1997). Patterns of life: Intertwining identity and cognition. Brain and Cognition, 34(1), 72-87. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1997.0907
Vogl, J. (2022). Capital y resentimiento. Una breve teoría del presente. Adriana Hidalgo/A. Hace.
Wu, T. (2016). The Attention Merchants: The Epic Scramble to Get Inside Our Heads, Knopf.
Žizêk, S. (2007). How to read Lacan. W. Norton and Company.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Vania Baldi
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.