Decolonizing Algorithmic Systems: A Critical Design to Problematize Algorithms and Digital Data from the South
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2021.24.3.2Keywords:
Algorithms, digitization, design, interdisciplinary research, social media, data collection, mobile phonesAbstract
This article offers methodological and theoretical reflections based on the interdisciplinary project “Algorithmic Identities.” Initiated in 2019 between researchers from the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile and the University of Warwick (UK), this project seeks to understand how personhood is configured in times of algorithms and digital data. We designed a prototype app, “Big Sister,” which emulates algorithmic profiling and recommendation systems of major digital platforms. This prototype has served as a twofold social research device. Firstly, it allowed us to produce knowledge from a critical and decolonial doing and undoing; secondly, through digital trace interviews with prototype users, we explored their experiences and stimulate reflection on the mediations of algorithms in their lives. This article examines the prototyping process of this app and some findings of how people in Chile understand, inhabit, and shape data and algorithms daily. Drawing on insights from Latin American authors such as Arturo Escobar, Jesús Martín-Barbero, and Paulo Freire, we argue how the prototyping of an app can move towards a “problematizing” approach to datafication and algorithmic systems in Latin America.
Downloads
References
Andrejevic, M. (2014). Big Data, Big Questions. The Big Data Divide. International Journal Of Communication, 8, 17. Recuperado de: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2161
Boehner, K., Gaver, W. y Boucher, A. (2012). Probes. En C. Lury y N. Wakeford (eds.), Inventive methods (pp. 199-215). Abingdon: Routledge.
Boyd, D. y Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for Big Data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication y Society, 15(5), 662-679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
Bucher, T. (2018). If...then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Corsín Jiménez, A. (ed.) (2018a). Prototyping cultures: Art, science and politics in beta. Abingdon: Routledge.
Corsín Jiménez, A. (2018b). Prototyping. En Lury, C. et al. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of interdisciplinary research methods (pp. 122-125). Abingdon: Routledge.
De Albuquerque, J. P. y De Almeida, A. A. (2020). Modes of engagement: Reframing ‘sensing’ and data generation in citizen science for empowering relationships. En Davies, T. y Mah, A. (eds.), Toxic truths: environmental justice and citizen science in a post truth age (pp. 267-281). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
DiSalvo, C. (2014). Critical making as materializing the politics of design. The Information Society, 30(2), 96-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2014.875770
DiSalvo, C. (2016). The irony of drones for foraging: Exploring the work of speculative interventions. En R. Smith, K. Vangkilde, M. Kjærsgaard, T. Otto, J. Halse y T. Binder (eds.), Design anthropological futures (pp. 139-154). Abingdon: Routledge.
Dubois, E. y Ford, H. (2015). Qualitative political communication. Trace interviews: An actor-centered approach. International Journal of Communication, 9, 25. Recuperado de: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3378
Escobar, A. (2017). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
Escobar, A. (2018). Autonomous design and the emergent transnational critical design studies field. Strategic Design Research Journal, 11(2), 139-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2018.112.10
Fry, T. (2017). Design for/by “The Global South”. Design Philosophy Papers, 15(1), 3-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2017.1303242
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogía del oprimido (2 ed.). México: Siglo XXI.
Freire, P. y Faundez, A. (1985). Por uma pedagogia da pergunta. R. M. Torres (ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
Gran, A.-B., Booth, P. y Bucher, T. (2020). To be or not to be algorithm aware: A question of a new digital divide? Information, Communication y Society, 24(12), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1736124
IBM (2019). Iniciación a Personality Insight. IBM Cloud Docs. Recuperado de: https://cloud.ibm.com/docs/personality-insights
Iliadis, A. y Russo, F. (2016). Critical data studies: An introduction. Big Data y Society. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716674238
Kennedy, H. (2018). Living with data. Aligning data studies and data activism through a focus on everyday experiences of datafication. Krisis. Journal for Contemporary Philosophy, 1, 18-30.
Kennedy, H., Elgesem, D. y Miguel, C. (2017). On fairness: User perspectives on social media data mining. Convergence. The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 23(3), 270-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856515592507
Kitchin, R. y Lauriault, T. (2018). Towards critical data studies: Charting and unpacking data assemblages and their work. En Thatcher, J., Eckert, J. y Shears, A. (eds.), Thinking big data in geography (pp. 3-20). Londres: University of Nebraska Press.
Latzko-Toth, G., Bonneau, C. y Millette, M. (2017). Small data, thick data: Thickening strategies for trace-based social media research. En Sloan, L. y Quan-Haase, A. (eds.), The Sage handbook of social media research methods (pp. 199-214). Londres: Sage.
Lupton, D. y Michael, M. (2017). ‘Depends on who’s got the data’: Public understandings of personal digital dataveillance. Surveillance y Society, 15(2), 254-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v15i2.6332
Lury, C. y Day, S. (2019). Algorithmic personalization as a mode of individuation. Theory, Culture y Society, 36(2), 17-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418818888
Lury, C. y Wakeford, N. (eds.) (2012). Inventive methods: The happening of the social. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203854921
Lury, C. et al. (eds.) (2018). Routledge handbook of interdisciplinary research methods (1 ed.). Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315714523
Markham, A. N. (2019). Critical pedagogy as a response to datafication. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(8), 754-760. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1177/1077800418809470
Marres, N. (2017). Digital sociology: The reinvention of social research. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Martín-Barbero, J. (1987). De los medios a las mediaciones. Comunicación, cultura y hegemonía. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
Mattelart, A. y Vitalis, A. (2015). De Orwell al cibercontrol. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Mejías, U. y Couldry, N. (2019). Colonialismo de datos: repensando la relación de los datos masivos con el sujeto contemporáneo. Virtualis, 10(18), 78-97. Recuperado de: https://www.revistavirtualis.mx/index.php/virtualis/article/view/289
Mignolo, W. (2013). Geopolítica de la sensibilidad y del conocimiento. Sobre (de)colonialidad, pensamiento fronterizo y desobediencia epistémica. Revista de Filosofía, 74, 7-23
Milan, S. y Treré, E. (2019). Big Data from the South(s): Beyond data universalism. Television & New Media, 20(4), 319-335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419837739
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression. How search engines reinforce racism. Nueva York: New York University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1pwt9w5
Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Londres: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674736061
Pybus, J., Coté, M. y Blanke, T. (2015). Hacking the social life of Big Data. Big Data & Society, 2(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/ 2053951715616649
Ratto, M. (2011). Critical making: Conceptual and material studies in technology and social life. The Information Society, 27(4), 252-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2011.583819
Ricaurte, P. (2018). Jóvenes y cultura digital: abordajes críticos desde América Latina. Chasqui. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación, 137, 15-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16921/chasqui.v0i137.3664
Ruckenstein, M. y Granroth, J. (2020). Algorithms, advertising and the intimacy of surveillance. Journal of Cultural Economy, 13(1), 12-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2019.1574866
Santos, B. de. S. (2017). Justicia entre saberes. Epistemologías del sur contra el epistemicidio. Madrid: Morata.
Seaver, N. (2015). The nice thing about context is that everyone has it. Media, Culture y Society, 37(7), 1101-1109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715594102
Siles, I., Segura-Castillo, A., Solís, R. y Sancho, M. (2020). Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify: Enacting data assemblages in the global South. Big Data & Society, 7(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720923377
Tello, A. M. (ed.). (2020). Tecnología, política y algoritmos en América Latina. Viña del Mar: Cenaltes.
Tygel, A. F. y Kirsch, R. (2016). Contributions of Paulo Freire to a critical data literacy: a popular education approach. The Journal of Community Informatics, 12(3), 108-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v12i3.3279
Xu, B., Gou, L., Xu, A., Mahmud, J. y Cosley, D. (2017). Raising awareness of conveyed personality in social media traces. arXiv.org. Disponible en: arXiv:1710.04205.
Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Palabra Clave
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
