The (Brazilian) Factory Floor of Artificial Intelligence: Data Production and the Role of Communication among Appen and Lionbridge Workers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2021.24.3.8Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, data production, platforms, labor, communicationAbstract
The article analyzes Brazilians’ work in global artificial intelligence (AI) platforms, especially Appen and Lionbridge, through exploratory research. We highlight the role of communication and data production for AI, outlining labor conditions and complexities as the factory floor. Thus, we interviewed workers and conducted observations in WhatsApp and Facebook groups. We divided the findings into five categories according to workers’ perception: hiring processes, time tracking and difficulties proving hours worked, lack of infrastructural reliability, work strategies and definition, and, finally, understanding of AI. Contrary to digital labor universalism, there is geopolitics in AI platform labor. The material conditions of data production and the role of communication among workers stand out as emerging and complex solidarities, as fissures and cracks, to devise strategies that deal with AI platform labor.
Downloads
References
Abilio, L. (2020). Digital platforms and uberization: Towards the globalization of an administrated South? Contracampo, 39(1), 1-15. Recuperado de https://periodicos.uff.br/contracampo/article/view/38579/
Ali, S. M. (2016). A Brief introduction to decolonial computing. XRDS: Crossroads, 22(4): 16-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2930886
Atanasoski, N. e Vora, K. (2019). Surrogate Humanity. Londres e Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478004455
Beer, D. (2019). The data gaze: Capitalism, power and perception. Londres: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526463210
Beer, D. (2016). Metric Power. Londres: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55649-3
Brinkmann, S. (2014). Unstructured and Semi-Structured Interviewing. Em P. Leavy (org.), The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 277-299). Nova York: Oxford University Press.
Cant, C. (2019). Riding for deliveroo: Resistance in the new economy. Londres: Polity.
Casilli, A. (2019). En attendant les robots: Enquête sur le travail du clic. Paris: Seuil.
Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. New Haven: Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1ghv45t
Couldry, N. e Mejias, U. (2019). The costs of connection. Palo Alto: Stanford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609754
Dardot, P. e Laval, C. (2013). The new way of the world: On neoliberal society. Londres: Verso.
Dyer-Witheford, N., Kjosen, A. e Steinhoff, J. (2019). Inhuman power: Artificial intelligence and the future of capitalism. Londres: Pluto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvj4sxc6
Ekbia, H. e Nardi, B. (2017). Heteromation, and other stories of computing and capitalism. Massachusetts: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10767.001.0001
Ferrari, F. e Graham, M. (2021). Fissures in algorithmic power: Platforms, code, and contestation. Cultural Studies, 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2021.1895250
Gillespie, T. (2020). Content moderation, AI, and the question of scale. Big Data & Society, 7(2), 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720943234
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Graham, M. e Anwar, M. (2019). The global gig economy: Towards a planetary labour market? First Monday, 24(4), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i4.9913
Graham, M., Hjorth, I. e Lehdonvirta, V. (2017). Digital labour and development: Impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer, 23(2), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916687250
Gray, M. e Suri, S. (2019). Ghost work. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Grohmann, R. (2020). Plataformização do trabalho: entre dataficação, financeirização e racionalidade neoliberal. EPTIC, 22(1), 1-15. https://seer.ufs.br/index.php/eptic/article/view/12188
Grohmann, R., Pereira, G., Guerra, A., Abilio, L., Moreschi, B., Jurno, A. et al. (no prelo). Platform Scams: Brazilian workers’ experiences of dishonest and uncertain algorithmic management. New Media & Society.
Gunkel, D. (2019). An introduction to communication and artificial intelligence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hewson, C. (2014). Qualitative approaches in internet-mediated research: Opportunities, issues, possibilities. Em Leavy, P. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 423-451). Nova York: Oxford University Press.
Irani, L. (2015). The cultural work of microwork. New Media & Society, 17(5), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813511926
Kalil, R. (2020). Capitalismo de plataforma e direito do trabalho: Crowdwork e trabalho sob demanda por meio de aplicativos. São Paulo: Blucher. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5151/9786555500295-03
Katz, Y. (2020). Artificial whiteness: Politics and ideology in artificial intelligence. Nova York: Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/katz19490
Kitchin, R. (2014). Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big data & society, 1(1), 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481
Ludec, C., Tubaro, P. e Casilli, A. (2019). How many people microwork in France? Estimating the size of a new labor force. arXiv: 1901.03889v1 [econ.GN]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.03889
Mignolo, W. (2014). Desobediencia epistémica: retórica de la modernidad, lógica de la colonialidad y gramática de la descolonialidad. Buenos Aires: Ediciones del Signo.
Milan, S. (2018). Cloud communities and the materiality of the digital. Em R. Bauböck (ed.), Debating Transformations of National Citizenship. IMISCOE Research Series. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92719-0_58
Milland, K. (2017). Slave to the keyboard: The broken promises of the gig economy. Transfer, 23(2), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917696233
Moreschi, B., Pereira, G. e Cozman. (2020). The Brazilian workers in Amazon Mechanical Turk: dreams and realities of ghost workers. Contracampo, 39(1), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22409/contracampo.v39i1.38252
Neff, G., McGrath, M. e Prakash, N. (2020). AI @ Work: Overcoming structural challenges to ensure successful implementation of AI in the workplace. Oxford Internet Institute. Available from: https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/blog/ai-work-overcoming-structural-challenges-to-ensure-successful-implementation-of-ai-in-the-workplace/
Ong, J. e Cabanes, J. (2019). When disinformation studies meets production studies: Social identities and moral justifications in the political trolling industry. International Journal of Communication, 13, 1-20. Available from: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/11417
Plantin, J-C. e Punathambekar, A. (2019). Digital Media Infrastructures: Pipes, Platforms, and Politics. Media, Culture & Society, 41(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718818376
Qiu, J., Gregg, M. e Crawford, K. (2014). Circuits of labour: A Labour theory of the iPhone era. TripleC, 12(2), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v12i2.540
Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology, 15(2), 215-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005
Ricaurte, P. (2019). Data epistemologies, the coloniality of power, and resistance. Television & New Media, 20(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419831640
Roberts, S. (2019). Behind the Screen: Content moderation in the shadows of social media. New Haven: Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvhrcz0v
Schmidt, F. (2019). Crowdsourced production of AI training data: How human workers teach self-driving cars how to see. Working Paper Forschungsförderung, n. 155, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
Soriano, C. e Cabanes, J. (2019). Between ‘world class work’ and ‘proletarianised labor’: Digital labor imaginaries in the Global South. Em E. Polson, L. Schofield-Clarke e R. Gajjala (eds.), Routledge Companion to Media and Class (pp. 1-29). Nova York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33767/osf.io/hfzk4
Treré, E. (2018). From digital activism to algorithmic resistance. Em M. Graham (org.), The Routledge companion to media and activism (pp. 1-14). Londres: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315475059-39
Tubaro, P. e Casilli, A. (2019). Micro-work, artificial intelligence and the automotive industry. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 46, 333-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-019-00121-1
Tubaro, P., Casilli, A. e Coville, M. (2020). The trainer, the verifier, the imitator: Three ways in which human platform workers support artificial intelligence. Big Data & Society, 7(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720919776
Van Dijck, J., Poell, T. e De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001
Van Doorn, N. e Badger, A. (2020). Platform capitalism’s hidden abode: Producing data assets in the gig economy. Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography, 52(5), 1475-1495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12641
Williams, R. (2005). Culture and materialism. Londres: Verso Books.
Wirth, N. (1985). Algorithms and data structures. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Woodcock, J. e Graham, M. (2019). The gig economy: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Polity.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Palabra Clave
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.