Del libro rojo de Winston al Black Mirror: dispositivos de control en la sociedad de la vigilancia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2020.23.1.3Keywords:
Surveillance society, panoptic, synoptic, predictive analytics, control devicesAbstract
From Winston’s Red Book to the Black Mirror: Control Devices in the Surveillance Society
Do livro vermelho de Winston a Black Mirror: dispositivos de controle na sociedade da vigilância
This article presents a theoretical reflection on surveillance as a guarantor of social order. It states that the new surveillance assembly that started with the launch of the Internet tends towards absolute control of life through direct and violent coercion, or entertainment and fun. It deals with three significant surveillance devices, namely, panoptic as a meeting point between the disciplinary society we no longer are and the surveillance society we are becoming; synoptic or the monitoring and surveillance of private, intimate and emotional life; and predictive analytics or the preference for finding correlations among millions of available everyday data that intends, if not to explain the cause of phenomena, to look for new forms of coercion. The reasons why the operation of these devices makes contemporary society a surveillance society are also explored. In expounding the characteristics of each of these devices, the article aims to reveal the role of surveillance in regulating social life. Finally, it reflects on the loss of freedom that brings about the trust and security gained as a result of voluntary or sometimes thoughtless submission to new, subtle and apparently innocent modes of control such as joining social media, subscribing to electronic services, or using any of the most popular search engines.
Para citar este artículo / to reference this article / para citar este artigo
Arango, M. R. (2020). Del libro rojo de Winston al Black Mirror: dispositivos de control en la sociedad de la vigilancia. Palabra Clave, 23(1), e2313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2020.23.1.3
Recibido: 29/01/2019
Aceptado: 26/03/2019
Publicado: 13/12/2019
Downloads
References
Arango, M. R. (2018). Las cadenas de la subjetividad: un estudio de los dispositivos de control de la vida social. Medellín, Colombia: Universidad Eafit.
Barrero, A. (2018, febrero 7). El Apple Watch rompe récords de ventas. Recuperado de https://www.lavanguardia.com/tecnologia/20180207/44590269290/apple-watch-ventas.html
Bauman, Z. (2007). Libertad. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Losada.
Bauman, Z. y Lyon, D. (2013). Vigilancia líquida (A. Capel Tatjer, trad.). Barcelona, España: Paidós.
Bauman, Z. (2006). Vida líquida (A. Santos Mosquera, trad.). Barcelona, España: Paidós.
Bichieri, C. (2019). Nadar en contra de la corriente: cómo unos pocos pueden cambiar los comportamientos de toda una sociedad (A. Casas, trad.). Bogotá, Colombia: Paidós.
Bigo, D. (2008). Security: A field left fallow. En M. Dillon & A. W. Neal (Eds.), Foucault on politics, security and war (pp. 93-114). Londres, RU: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bogard, W. (2006). Surveillance assemblages and lines of flight. En D. Lyon (Ed.), Theorizing Surveillance: The panopticon and beyond (pp. 97-122). Cullompton, RU: Willan Publishing.
Chou, H.-T. G. & Edge, N. (2012). “They are happier and having better lives than I am”: The impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others’ lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 117-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0324
Coviello, L., Sohn, Y., Kramer, A. D., Marlow, C., Franceschetti, M., Christakis, N. A. & Fowler, J. H. (2014). Detecting emotional contagion in massive social networks. PloS one, 9(3), e90315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090315
Debord, G. (2002). La sociedad del espectáculo (J. L. Pardo, trad.). Valencia, España: Pre-Textos.
Deleuze, G. (1995). Conversaciones, 1972-1990. Valencia, España: Pre-Textos.
Drouin, M., Miller, D., Wehle, S. M. J. & Hernandez, E. (2016). Why do people lie online? “Because everyone lies on the internet”. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 134-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.052
Elmer, G. & Opel, A. (2006). Pre-empting panoptic surveillance: Surviving the inevitable war on terror . En D. Lyon (Ed.), Theorizing Surveillance: The panopticon and beyond (pp. 139-159). Cullompton, RU: Willan Publishing.
Foucault, M. (1989). Vigilar y castigar: nacimiento de la prisión. Ciudad de México, México: Siglo XXI.
Foucault, M. (2007). Historia de la sexualidad. Vol. I: La voluntad de saber (31.ª ed.). Ciudad de México, México: Siglo XXI.
Genosko, G. & Thompson, S. (2006). Tense theory: Temporalities of surveillance. En D. Lyon (Ed.), Theorizing Surveillance: The panopticon and beyond (pp. 123-138). Cullompton, RU: Willan Publishing.
Haggerty, K. D. (2006). Tear down the walls: On demolishing the panopticon. En D. Lyon (Ed.), Theorizing Surveillance: The panopticon and beyond (pp. 23-45). Cullompton, RU: Willan Publishing.
Han, B.-C. (2012). La sociedad del cansancio (A. S. Arregi, trad.). Barcelona, España: Herder.
Han, B.-C. (2014). Psicopolítica: neoliberalismo y nuevas técnicas de poder. Barcelona, España: Herder.
Han, B.-C. (2018). Buen entretenimiento. Barcelona, España: Herder.
Hartmans, A. (2017, diciembre 25). People still aren’t buying smartwatches — and it’s only going to get worse. Recuperado de https://www.businessinsider.com/smartwatch-usage-declining-emarketer-report-says-2017-12
Koskela, H. (2006). ‘The other side of surveillance’: Webcams, power and agency. En D. Lyon (Ed.), Theorizing Surveillance: The panopticon and beyond (pp. 163-181). Cullompton, RU: Willan Publishing.
Lipovetsky, G. (1998). La era del vacío: ensayos sobre el individualismo contemporáneo. Barcelona, España: Anagrama.
Los, M. (2006). Looking into the future: Surveillance, globalization and the totalitarian potential. En D. Lyon (Ed.), Theorizing Surveillance: The panopticon and beyond (pp. 69-94). Cullompton, RU: Willan Publishing.
Lyon, D. (1995). El ojo electrónico: el auge de la sociedad de la vigilancia (J. Alborés, trad.). Madrid, España: Alianza.
Lyon, D. (2003). Introduction. En D. Lyon (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting: Privacy, risk, and digital discrimination (pp. 1-9). Londres, RU: Routledge.
Lyon, D. (2006). The search for surveillance theories. En Lyon (Ed.), Theorizing Surveillance: The panopticon and beyond (pp. 3-20). Cullompton, RU: Willan Publishing.
Manjarrés, E. (2017). Facebook en la sociedad de control: aplicación simultánea del panóptico y del sinóptico en un dispositivo de vigilancia y control (Tesis de maestría, Universidad Eafit, Medellín, Colombia).
Mayer-Schönberger, V. & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: la revolución de los datos masivos (A. J. I. Jurado, trad.). Madrid, España: Turner.
Nielsen, J. (2006, octubre 9). The 90-9-1 Rule for Participation Inequality in Social Media and Online Communities. Recuperado de https://www.nngroup.com/articles/participation-inequality/
Norris, C. (2003). From personal to digital: CCTV, the panopticon, and the technological mediation of suspicion and social control. En D. Lyon (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting: Privacy, risk, and digital discrimination (pp. 249-281). Londres, RU: Routledge.
Orwell, G. (1949/2018). 1984 (3.ª ed.). Barcelona, España: Penguin Random House.
Whitaker, R. (1999). El fin de la privacidad: cómo la vigilancia total se está convirtiendo en realidad. Barcelona, España: Paidós.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.