Entre ecología y epistemología de la vida plataformizada: incorporación, interpasividad y premediación en los procesos de comunicación
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2024.27.4.10Palabras clave:
Cognición incorporada, interpasividad, affordance, ecología de los medios, premediaciónResumen
El artículo pretende presentar una fenomenología de las relaciones con, a través y entre los medios digitales en un contexto de cultura plataformizada. Mediante el análisis de un conjunto de prácticas sociales mediadas por tecnologías digitales, se esboza la reconfiguración de un nuevo campo de experiencias propicio para la formación de nuevos habitus cognitivos y perceptivos. Para comprender este nuevo escenario sociotécnico, mostramos el potencial heurístico de una metodología analítica basada en la articulación entre las categorías de media ecology, material engagement e affordance. La complementariedad de estos tres prismas interpretativos resulta pertinente en el contexto de la crítica cultural a la plataformización de las identidades, los dispositivos de poder computacional, los procesos de valorización social y la epistemología que los sustenta.
Descargas
Citas
Andrejevic, M. (2008). Watching Television Without Pity: The Productivity of Online Fans. Television & New Media, 9(1), 24-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476407307241
Attali, J. (2015). Peut-on prévoir l’avenir? Ed Fayard.
Baldi, V. (2017). Más allá de la sociedad algorítmica y automatizada. Para una reapropiación crítica de la Cultura Digital. (OBS*) Observatorio, 11(3), 186-198. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS11320171093
Baldi, V. (2018) A construção viral da realidade: ciberpopulismos e polarização dos públicos em rede. (OBS*) Observatório, 12(5), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS12520181420
Beer, D. (2016). Metric Power. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55649-3
Bourdieu, P. (1983). La distinzione. Critica sociale del gusto. Il Mulino
Bucher, T. e Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. Em J. Burgess, A. Marwick e T. Poell. The sage handbook of social media (pp. 233-253). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066
Cabitza, F., Campagner, A. e Simone, C. (2021). The need to move away from agential-AI: Empirical investigations, useful concepts and open issues. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 155, 102696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102696
Carbone, M. (2021). Da corpi con protesi a corpi come “quasi-protesi”?. Ágalma, 40. Mimesis (pp. 28-35).
Carbone, M. e Lingua, G. (2023). Toward an anthropology of screens: Showing and hiding, exposing and protecting. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30816-1
Cardoso, G. (2023). A Comunicação da comunicação. As pessoas são a mensagem. Mundos Sociais.
Corbin, A. (1998). Mai 68. Avenir d’une revolte. Magazine Littéraire, 365.
Crary, J. (2015). 24/7. O Capitalismo tardio e os fins do sono. Antígona.
Crary, J. (2023). Terra arrasada. Além da era digital, rumo a um mundo pós-capitalista. Ubu.
Dean, J. (2010). Blog theory: Feedback and capture in the circuits of drive. Polity Press Cambridge.
Empoli, G. (2023). Os engenheiros do caos. Gradiva.
Finn, E. (2017). What algorithms want: Imagination in the age of computing. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262035927.001.0001
Fisher, M. (2021). Realismo capitalista. Não haverá alternativa? VS.
Floridi, L. (2015). The onlife manifesto. Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. Spinger. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6
Gabielkov, M., Ramachandran, A., Chaintreau, A. e Legout, A. (2016). Social clicks: What and who gets read on Twitter? SIGMETRICS’16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGMETRICS International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Science, 179-192. https://doi.org/10.1145/2896377.2901462
Gehlen, A. (1960). A alma na era da técnica. Livros do Brasil.
Gell, A. (1998). Art and Agency. An Anthropological Theory. Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198280132.001.0001
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin.
Glenski, M., Weninger T. e Volkova S. (2018). Identifying and Understanding User Reactions to Deceptive and Trusted Social News Sources. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P18-2029
Greenfield, A. (2017). Radical Technologies: The Design of Everyday Life. Verso.
Grusin, R. (2010). Premediation: Affect and Mediality After 9/11. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230275270
Hari, J. (2022). Stolen focus: Why you can’t pay attention. Bloomsbury.
Harris, T. (2016). How Technology is Hijacking Your Mind — from a Magician and Google Design Ethicist. https://medium.com/thrive-global/how-technology-hijacks-peoples-minds-from-a-magician-and-google-s-design-ethicist-56d62ef5edf3
Hildebrandt, M. (2020). Code Driven Law. Scaling the Past and Freezing the Future. Em C. Markou, C. e S. Deakin (eds.), Is Law Computable? Critical Perspectives on Law and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 67-84). Hart Publishers.
Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and Technology: From the telephone to the Internet. Polity.
Ihde, D. e Malafouris, L. (2019). Homo faber revisited: Postphenomenology and Material Engagement Theory. Em Philosophy and Technology, 32, 195-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0321-7
Kozyreva, A., Wineburg, S., Lewandowsky, S. e Hertwig, R. (2023). Critical Ignoring as a Core Competence for Digital Citizens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 32(1), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221121570
James, W. (1904). The principles of psychology (v. 2). Henry Holt & Company.
Larkin, B. (2013). The Politics and Poetics of Infraestructre. Annual Review of Antropology, 42, 327-343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522
Latour, B. (2015). Face à Gaïa: Huit conférences sur le nouveau régime climatique. La Découverte. https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.latou.2015.01
Leder Mackley, K. e Jewitt, C. (2022). Sociotechnical imaginaries of remote personal touch before and during COVID-19: An analysis of UK newspapers. New Media & Society, 268, 4361-4389. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221113922
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. McGraw Hill.
Malafouris, L. (2013) How Things Shape the Mind. A Theory of Material Engagement. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9476.001.0001
Markham, A. N. (2021). Echolocation as theory of digital sociality. Convergence, 27(6), 1558-1570. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 13548565211047158
Mauss, M. (1936). Les techniques du corps. Journal de Psychologie, XXXII, N. 3-4.
McVeigh-Schultz, J. e Baym, N. K. (2015). Thinking of you: Vernacular affordance in the context of the microsocial relationship app, couple. Social Media + Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604649
Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. PublicAffairs
Nagy, P., e Neff, G. (2015). Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media + Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603385
Newen, A., De Bruin, L. e Gallagher, S. (2018). The Oxford Handbook 4E Cognition. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ oxfordhb/9780198735410.001.0001
Norman, D. (1990). The Design of Everyday Things. Doubleday Business.
Orwell, G. (1958). The road to Wigan Pier. Harcourt, Brace.
Pariser, E. (2011). O filtro invisível. O que a internet está escondendo de você. Zahar.
Pfaller, R. (2017). Interpassivity: The Aesthetics of Delegated Enjoyment. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474422925.001.0001
Papacharissi, Z. (2014), Affective Publics. Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001
Perniola, M. (1991). Del sentire. Einaudi
Perniola, M. (2009). Miracoli e traumi della comunicazione. Einaudi.
Petit, V. (2013). Vocubalaire d’Ars Industrialis. Em B. Stiegler (ed.), Pharmacologie du Front national (pp. 369-441). Flammarion.
Poell, T., Brooke, D. B. e Duffy, E. (2021). Platforms and Cultural Production. Polity.
Postman, N. (1979). Teaching as a Conserving Activity. Dalcorte Press.
Reuters Institute (2023). Digital News Report 2022. Oxford University.
Romele, A. (2019). Digital Hermeneutics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429331893
Robins, D. e Holmes, J. (2008). Aesthetics and credibility in web site design. Information Processing and Management, 44, 386-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.02.003
Sadin, E. (2020). L’ère de l’individu tyran. La fin d’un monde comun. Èditionne Grasset & Fasquelle.
Savulich, G, Thorp, E, Piercy, T, Peterson, KA, Pickard, JD e Sahakian, BJ (2019). Improvements in Attention Following Cognitive Training with the Novel “Decoder” Game on an iPad. Front. Behav. Neurosci., 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00002
Simondon, G. (1958). Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Aubier.
Söderberg, J. e Maxigas, (2022). Resistance to the Current: The Dialectics of Hacking. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13466.001.0001
Stiegler, B. (2014). Digital studies: Organologie des savoirs et technologies de la connaissance. FYP Editions.
Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life. Biology, phenomenology and the sciences of the mind. The Belkanp Press of Harward University Press.
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
Uexküll, J. Von. (1982). Dos animais e dos homens: Digressões pelos seus mundos próprios. Doutrina do Significado. Livros do Brasil.
Varela, F. J. (1997). Patterns of life: Intertwining identity and cognition. Brain and Cognition, 34(1), 72-87. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1997.0907
Vogl, J. (2022). Capital y resentimiento. Una breve teoría del presente. Adriana Hidalgo/A. Hace.
Wu, T. (2016). The Attention Merchants: The Epic Scramble to Get Inside Our Heads, Knopf.
Žizêk, S. (2007). How to read Lacan. W. Norton and Company.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Vania Baldi
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Esta revista y sus artículos se publican bajo la licencia CreativeCommons CC BY 4.0 DEED Atribución 4.0 Internacional, usted es libre de: Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato para cualquier propósito, incluso comercialmente. Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material para cualquier propósito, incluso comercialmente. La licencia no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia.
