Estudar o desconhecido, publicar o possível? A resposta à pandemia da covid-19 nas principais revistas Scopus em Ciências da Comunicação

Fábio Ribeiro; Sónia Silva; Juan José Perona

doi:10.5294/pacla.2023.26.4.3

Autores/as

Fábio Ribeiro Autor/a University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8071-6145
Sónia Silva Autor/a University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8166-9851
Juan José Perona Autor/a Autonomous University of Barcelona https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8256-9070

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2023.26.4.3

Palabras clave:

Covid-19, ciencias de la comunicación, Scopus, revistas científicas, investigación

Resumen

Cuando la OMS declaró la pandemia de covid-19 en marzo de 2020, los científicos desconocían la existencia de esta enfermedad. Al mismo tiempo, la ONU pidió esfuerzos concertados para difundir datos científicos sobre el virus. Si desde el punto de vista médico y biológico se conoce la respuesta a la pandemia, que sería decisiva para combatir el virus, poco se sabe de las preocupaciones que ocupaban a los investigadores de las Ciencias de la Comunicación en un momento en que era necesario transmitir mensajes de riesgo a la población. A partir de una muestra de las 20 revistas más destacadas en el índice Scopus, se buscó caracterizar la investigación que cruzó la pandemia con la comunicación en el primer año de esta crisis (marzo 2020-marzo 2021). En los 42 trabajos sobre la covid-19, se concluye que los investigadores no trabajaron en una lógica de asociación internacional, donde se han destacado las preocupaciones sobre los impactos digitales de la covid-19 en la sociedad.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. e Mele, I. (2022). Impact of Covid-19 on research output by gender across countries. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04245-x

Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001

Biswas, M. (2013). Health organizations’ use of social media tools during a pandemic situation: An H1N1 flu context. Journal of New Communication Research, 5(1), 46-81. https://doi.org/10.4236/aa.2013.31007

Boholm, B. (2008). New perspectives on risk communication: Uncertainty in a complex society. Journal of Risk Research, 11(1-2). https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870801947897

Calisher, C., Carroll, D., Colwell, R., Corley, R. B., Daszak, P., Drosten, C., Enjuanes, L., Farrar, J., Field, H., Golding J., Gorbalenya, A., Haagmans, B., Hughes, J. M., Karesh, W. B., Keusch, G. T., Lam, S. K., Lubroth, J., Mackenzie, J. S., Madoff, L… Turner, M. (2020). Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19. The Lancet, 395(10226), E42-E43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30418-9

Carvalho, T. A., Lima, T. M., Melani, V. F., Mendes, M. F., Pereira, L. R. e Marson, F. A. L. (2020). The scientific production during 2009 swine flu pandemic and 2019/2020 COVID-19 pandemic. Pulmonology, 26(6), 340-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2020.07.009

Else, H. (2020). How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing — In seven charts. Nature, 588(7839). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03564-y

Ferreira, P. J. (2022, 16 jul.). Ciência aberta e crescimento económico. Jornal de Notícias. https://www.jn.pt/opiniao/convidados/ciencia-aberta-e-crescimento-economico-15046847.html?fbclid=IwAR2cPShYSXfysyULOcUXeMzyaeieIocck8e49unkB3ofMGAXwhXBofnHr34

Finset, A., Bosworth, H., Butow, P., Gulbrandsen, P., Hulsman, R. L., Pieterse, A. H., Street, R., Tschoetschel, R. e Van Weert, J. (2020). Effective health communication: A key factor in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient Education and Counseling, 103(5), 873-876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.027

Grimes, T. e Peirce, K. (2013). Three reasons samples become separated from their populations in communication research. Mass Communication and Society, 16(3), 441-459. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2012.725796

Hook, D. e Porter, S. (2020, 22 de dezembro). The COVID brain drain. Wich research fields are losing out? Nature index. https://www.nature.com/nature-index/news-blog/covid-brain-drain-scientific-research

Korbel, J. O. e Stegle, O. (2020). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on life scientists. Genome Biology, 21(113). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02031-1

Lane, J. N. e Lifshitz-Assaf, H. (2022, 3 maio), Dismanting the ivory tower’s knowledge boundaries. A call for open access as the new normal in the social sciences post-COVID. Broookings. https://www.brookings.edu/research/dismantling-the-ivory-towers-knowledge-boundaries-a-call-for-open-access-as-the-new-normal-in-the-social-sciences-post-covid/

León, B., López-Goñi, I. e Salaverría, R. (2022). The Covid-19 catastrophe: A science communication mess? Church, Communication and Culture, 7(1), 6-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2022.2031236

Lemon, L. L. e VanDyke, M. S. (2021). Expanding the discussion on internal management of risk communication: A critique of the current risk communication literature. Public Relations Inquiry, 10(3), 377-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X211014086

Maia, P., Justi, R. e Santos, M. (2021). Aspects about science in the context of production and communication of knowledge of COVID‑19. Science & Education, 30, 1075-1098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00229-8

Mollema, L., Harmsen, I. A., Broekhuizen, E., Clijnk, R., De Melker, H., Paulussen, T., Kok, G., Ruiter, R. e Das, E. (2015). Disease detection or public opinion: Reflection? Content analysis of tweets, other social media, and online newspapers during the measles outbreak in The Netherlands in 2013. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(5), e128. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3863

Oliveira, E., Carvalho, A., Silva, J., Neto, A., Moura, M. e Freitas, D. (2020). Analysis of scientific production on the new coronavirus (COVID-19): a bibliometric analysis. São Paulo MED, 139(1), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0449.r1.01102020

Organização das Nações Unidas para a Educação, a Ciência e a Cultura. (2020). Acesso aberto para facilitar a pesquisa e a informação sobre covid-19. Unesco. https://pt.unesco.org/covid19/communicationinformationresponse/opensolutions

Quivy, R. e Campenhoudt, L. (1992). Manual de investigação em Ciências Sociais. Gradiva.

Riccaboni, M. e Verginer, L. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientific research in the life sciences. Plos One, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263001

Ruão, T. e Silva. S. (2021). Science Communication: The origins of the “flatten the curve” metaphor in COVID-19 media messages. Em S. Balonas, T. Ruão e M. V. Carrillo (coords.), Strategic Communication in Context (pp. 175-211). CECS/Editora UMinho. https://doi.org/10.21814/uminho.ed.46.9

Saitz, R. e Schwitzer, G. (2020). Communicating science in the time of a pandemic. Jama, 324(5), 443-444. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.12535

Salaverría, R. (2021). Entender y combatir la desinformación sobre ciencia y salud. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación. https://dadun.unav.edu/handle/10171/60223

Srivastava, K. C., Shrivastava, D., Chhabra, K. G., Naqvi, W. e Sahu, A. (2020). Facade of media and social media during Covid-19: A review. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences 11(1), 142-149. https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v11iSPL1.2288

Taipale, S. e Fortunati, L. (2013). Capturing methodological trends in mobile communication studies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(5), 627-642. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.862562

Vaughan, E. (2009). Effective health risk communication about pandemic influenza for vulnerable populations. American Journal of Public Health, 99, S324-S332. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.162537