|
Artículos
Anna Tous Rovirosa 1
Raquel Crisóstomo Gálvez 2
Elena Fedotova 3
Natividad Ramajo Hernández 4
1
0000-0003-4519-3793.
Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain.
anna.tous@uab.cat
2
0000-0003-1895-2889.
Universidad Internacional de Valencia, Spain.
rcrisostomo@eserp.com
3
0000-0002-8772-3601.
Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain.
elena.fedotova@autonoma.cat
4
0000-0002-6233-0879.
Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain.
natividad.ramajo@uab.cat
* This paper was financed by the Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona and derives from the project "Gender Equality in Sports-Themed Audiovisual Fiction. Insight into Stereotypes and Psychological Dimensions. Women, Men, and LGTBIQ Groups Representation (Gendered-Sports-Fiction)," under grant number PPC2023 574367.
** El presente artículo fue financiado por la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona y es resultado del proyecto "Igualdad de género en la ficción audiovisual deportiva. Análisis de estereotipos y dimensiones psicológicas. Representación de mujeres, hombres y grupos LGTBIQ+ (ficción deportiva con perspectiva de género)", con número de subvención PPC2023 574367.
*** Este artigo foi financiado pela Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona e é derivado do projeto "Gender Equality in Sports-Themed Audiovisual Fiction. Insight into Stereotypes and Psychological Dimensions. Women, Men, and LGTBIQ Groups Representation (Gendered-Sports-Fiction)", número da bolsa: PPC2023 574367.
Received: 30/11/2024
Submitted to peers: 23/01/2025
Accepted by peers: 11/03/2025
Approved: 03/04/2025
Para citar este artículo / to reference this article / para citar este artigo: Tous Rovirosa, A., Crisóstomo Gálvez, R., Fedotova, E., & Ramajo Hernández, N. (2025). Queer and Non-Normative Characters: Underrepresentation and Clichés in Contemporary Sports TV Series. Palabra Clave, 28(3), e2831. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2025.28.3.1
Abstract
This article highlights the lack of visibility of queer and non-normative characters in contemporary European and American sports television series by studying how these characters are usually presented and a narrative analysis of characters. We carried out mixed methods research, involving a qualitative study with two focus groups, with results pointing to the perpetuation of stereotypes and the idea of heterosexual overrepresentation, and quantitative research, based on 208 characters in 15 sports TV series, which confirms the limited diversity of these characters in contemporary fictional sports TV series. The quantitative results are strikingly contradictory to the qualitative results and show that the audience's perception is that LGBTQI+ characters are overrepresented, which is a heteronormative attitude and a major discrepancy with the assumptions of gender studies. Interestingly, the few TV series that highlight the subject do so with a generous representation of homosexual characters (The Hockey Girls, Ted Lasso, and A League of Their Own) and a positive inclusion, promoting their acceptance and normalization, from a standpoint that is clearly opposed to homophobia.
Keywords: Social inclusion; gender minorities; serials; television; homophobia
Resumen
Este artículo constata la falta de visibilidad de personajes queer y no normativos en las series deportivas contemporáneas europeas y estadounidenses a través del estudio de la representación característica de estos personajes y del análisis narrativo correspondiente. Para ello, se llevó a cabo una investigación mixta: un estudio cualitativo a través de dos grupos focales cuyos resultados apuntan a la perpetuación de estereotipos y a la idea de sobrerrepresentación, y una investigación cuantitativa de 208 personajes de 15 series deportivas europeas y estadounidenses que corrobora la poca presencia de estos personajes en la ficción deportiva serial contemporánea. Los resultados cuantitativos son llamativamente opuestos a los cualitativos y explicitan que la percepción de la audiencia es de sobrerrepresentación de personajes LGTBIQ+, lo que demuestra un planteamiento heteronormativo y una gran brecha con los postulados de los estudios de género. Cabe destacar que las pocas series que visibilizan el tema lo hacen con una representación positiva y abundante de personajes homosexuales (Les de l'hoquei, Ted Lasso y A League of Their Own) que promueve la aceptación y normalización del colectivo, desde una posición claramente contraria a la homofobia.
Palabras clave: Inclusión social; serie; televisión; grupo sexual minoritario; homofobia
Resumo
Este artigo confirma a falta de visibilidade de personagens queer e não normativos nas séries esportivas europeias e estadunidenses contemporâneas por meio do estudo da representação característica desses personagens e da análise narrativa correspondente. Para tanto, foi realizada uma pesquisa mista: um estudo qualitativo a partir de dois grupos focais, cujos resultados apontam para a perpetuação de estereótipos e a ideia de super-representação; e uma pesquisa quantitativa de 208 personagens de 15 séries esportivas europeias e estadunidenses, que corrobora a baixa presença desses personagens na ficção esportiva seriada contemporânea. Os resultados quantitativos são notavelmente contrários aos qualitativos e deixam explícito que a percepção do público é de super-representação de personagens LGTBIQ+, o que demonstra uma abordagem heteronormativa e uma grande lacuna em relação aos postulados dos estudos de gênero. Deve-se notar que as poucas séries que tornam a questão visível o fazem com uma representação positiva e abundante de personagens homossexuais (Les de Vhoquei, Ted Lasso e A League of Their Own), promovendo a aceitação e normalização do coletivo a partir de uma posição claramente contrária à homofobia.
Palavras-chave: Inclusão social; série; televisão; grupo sexual minoritário; homofobia
Introduction: Significant Absences and Structural Heteronormativity
Fiction is a powerful medium that shapes and reflects sociocultural norms, creating identities through its representation of issues, communities, and trends (Collier et al., 2009; Fiske, 1987/2011; Gergen, 2009), by means of what Lal (1995) termed "symbolic interactions." The case of the queer community, in which serial fiction plays a crucial role for emerging LGBTQI+ people,1 is no exception, as social cognitive theory points out (Bandura, 2011). Various studies (González de Garay et al., 2023; Higueras-Ruiz, 2023) have pointed out that the representation of sexual and gender minorities in the media is crucial if these identities are to be visible and normalized in society (González de Garay & Alvarez, 2017; Madzarevic & Soto, 2018).
Theoretical Framework
Greater Visibility but Limited Representation
The number of LGBTQI+ characters on international streaming television has increased significantly in recent years (Masanet et al., 2022; Sánchez Soriano, 2024), and the phenomenon of quality television has foregrounded this community's stories and experiences (GLAAD, 2023). Since the beginning of the third golden age of television,2 there have been numerous gay-friendly fictions.
Fiction exists within a hierarchical social system that privileges and punishes individuals based on binary assumptions about gender and sexuality and defines beliefs about what is "normal" (Herz & Johansson, 2015, p. 2). Although their visibility has increased, only 11 % of regular characters in U.S. television series were identified as LGBTQI+ in the 2022-2023 television season (GLAAD, 2023). LGBTQI+ people continue to be portrayed as one-dimensional and stereotypical, and many of their subgroups are ignored (McInroy & Craig, 2017). They are more visible as a group, but underrepresented (Woods & Hardman, 2021). Recent studies argue that characters from this group are, in fact, included as a narrative resource (Valverde Maestre & Pérez Rufí, 2021, p. 169).
Non-heteronormative identities are practically non-existent, and when they do appear, they are based on various representational clichés: "Does he even like sports? Everyone knows he's gay" (Heartstopper, Piggott, 2022). The quote illustrates the association bias between gender identity and sports. The issue seems to be more complex in the sporting sphere due to the traditional ties between sports, hegemonic masculinity and cisheterosexuality (Messner, 2002), with sports as places for male socialization within classic heteronormativity (Rutherford, 1992/2023), and the celebration of male bonding (Lotz, 2014). The study by Bachmann and Gooch (2018) on representation in sports media shows that stories of LGBTQI+ people are often rendered invisible or dealt with superficially, perpetuating prevailing social attitudes, within which sport has been a bastion of traditional masculinity and normative heterosexuality (Miller, 2001). Recent research shows that there is still a lack of representation and "distortion" in the representation of LGBTQI+ characters in various media formats and countries, with "adherence to binary gender roles" (Soto-Sanfiel & Sánchez Soriano, 2024).
Stereotypical Representational Characteristics: Microhomophobia and Sexism
How this group is presented does not always reflect reality, and television tropes and stereotypes, which are legacies of social prejudices, continue to be used (Valverde Maestre & Pérez Rufí, 2021, p. 179). Some of these clichés are sexist as well as homophobic. They include gay men being represented as effeminate (Shugart, 2003), with stereotypically feminine characteristics, such as dressing well, being exaggeratedly flamboyant, or adopting high pitched voices (Chambers, 2009), as well as positive characteristics such as warmth and competence (Sink et al., 2018). Microhomophobic signals are also plentiful. These consist of internalized homophobia (Aznar Orbea, 2020) and consolidate the dominance of heteronormativity over other non-heterosexual sexual identities (Heredia Leal, 2021). The representation of gay men may also include stereotyping as a victim or as a villainous "other." The association with a lack of masculinity is reinforced in gay men (Marcos-Ramos et al., 2023), and the stereotypical gay man is presented as "white, Caucasian, high-class, with a nice physique, educated and sophisticated" (Ramírez Alvarado & Cobo Durán, 2013, p. 65).
Given that social identities and the lack of equality between them based on sexual orientation and gender are intersectional (Bowleg, 2008), lesbians are represented in a sexist manner as women and as lesbians. They were initially represented as being tough, with masculine gestures, short hair, baggy clothes, and involved in masculine sports (Tropiano, 2002), usually known as tomboys (Bailey et al., 2002). This representation increasingly seems to verge on being a cliché, with a prevailing and inescapable femininity (Meyer & Lee, 2006), leading to a characteristic binary perpetuation and objectification based on the sexualization of the established heteropatriarchal male gaze, where "this type of plot and character has often been more closely linked to the construction of an object of desire intended to please a heterosexual male gaze—the hot lesbian (Annati & Ramsey, 2022)—than to offer a model which could provide the basis for lesbian women to identify with" (Guerrero- Pico et al., 2017, p. 32). Within this trend, lesbian women live in an oxymoron involving objectified visibility on the one hand, and one of invisibility on the other. There are also plot clichés typical of how these groups have been traditionally represented in fiction, such as a large number of gay characters meeting tragic ends (Bury Your Gays), which although it affects all types of men, women and queer identities, "has a particularly significant impact on lesbian and bisexual characters, who have their own name for the cliché 'Dead Lesbian Syndrome'" (Guerrero- Pico et al., 2017, p. 31).
These queer characters, both male and female, are included in heteronormative plots, perpetuating structures of sociocultural relationships based on normative cisheteropatriarchal mechanisms (Ramírez Alvarado & Cobo Durán, 2013, p. 65). They are represented identities that adopt a role similar to what is culturally accepted as feminine or masculine (Sánchez Soriano, 2024).
Exceptions: Examples of Sports Series with LGBTQI+ Characters
From the analyzed sample (15 series), we have selected the most important sports series that included main characters from this group. In The Hockey Girls (Azemar et al., 2019), the hockey players in the Patí Minerva club and their coach fight to ensure the future of their team as they struggle to find their niche in the world. The players are teenagers, and some of them are homosexuals who are accepted and respected by their communities.
Ted Lasso (Sudeikis et al., 2020) is the name of the coach who leaves the American football league to coach a British soccer team. The series adopts a feel-good tone as it chronicles the adventures of the AFC Richmond team in the Premier League and those of the club's management and players, interweaving the club's story with their personal lives. There is a naturalized representation in the third season with Keeley (Juno Temple) and Colin (Billy Harris).
A League of Their Own (Graham & Jacobson, 2022) is the heir to the 1992 film of the same name. Against the backdrop of World War II, the narrative recounts how, between 1943 and 1954, in the absence of male players fighting at the front, a professional women's baseball league—the All-American Girls Professional Baseball League (AAGPBL)—was established. The series looks at the lives of the Rockford Peaches players, focusing above all on the changes in their lives and their unprecedented opportunity to play a sport they are passionate about professionally. The series is one of the most famous exceptions in the representation of lesbian women in sports television series. The players' image and behavior (in reality and the fictional version) had to be ostensibly feminine (Dreier, 2021).
Male professional soccer players disclosing their homosexuality remains a sensitive issue, as reflected in Ted Lasso. Very few have done so in recent decades, and those presumably represent a very small proportion of the real numbers. Justin Fashanu was the first player to come out as gay (The Sun, 1990) and came to a tragic end. One of the most recent and famous players to do so was Josh Cavallo, who plays for Adelaide United in Australia (Gillespie, 2021), although there have been others, such as Jakub Jankto from the Czech Republic (BBC News Mundo, 2023). There have been a limited number of cases, and as such, those who publicly disclose their sexual orientation continue to make the news today. The absence of any normalization in "coming out" by gay male professional soccer players is entirely counter to the narrative representation of the quasi warrior, because of their association with an (ultra-)normative heterosexuality. The institutions involved currently adopt a conservative, indifferent, or homophobic attitude. FIFA has been accused of "rainbow-washing" (Beare & Boucaut, 2024), while the English Premier League and the Australian League have undertaken initiatives including the Rainbow Laces campaign (2023) and the Pride Round (2023). However, the LGBTQI+ slogans were quickly removed as soon as they sparked controversy.
The initial position of female homosexuality in sport is diametrically opposite, as it has only recently begun to obtain some media coverage. Minority sports appeal to an even smaller minority when they are women's sports. In these contexts, i.e., without being subject to public scrutiny as some soccer players, it would be reasonable to assume that players who are lesbians could acknowledge their sexuality without too much difficulty, or simply not conceal it because they see no need to do so. The absence of a taboo may mean that the representation in women's sport is more consistent with the real figure than in men's sport, and public opinion often confuses this due to a prejudiced association between sport and lesbianism (De la Cretaz, 2022).
Objectives and Hypotheses
Primary objectives: to determine whether there is a paradigm shift in sports television series in terms of the presence of LGBTQI+ characters; to determine the (under)representation of LGBTQI+ characters in fictional sports series; to examine sports narratives in terms of the balanced levels of representation of queer characters in sports series; and to examine the audience's perception of homosexual characters.
Primary hypothesis: LGBTQI+ representation in sports television fiction continues to be stereotyped and promotes a false increase in its visibility, when in fact there is an underrepresentation. The assertion of the role and prominence of LGBTQI+ characters is not significant in sports fiction (quantitative methodology). Sexist and homophobic behaviors persist in television sports fiction (qualitative methodology of character analysis). There is a vast difference between gender studies and society's perception (qualitative methodology used for focus group reception).
Methodology and Sample
Quantitative Analysis
A sample of 15 series, comprising 208 characters, was subjected to quantitative content analysis. The inclusion criteria stipulated that the productions had been broadcast in Spain between 2018 and 2023, were aimed at adult audiences, and reflected the scope of the most relevant U.S. audiovisual platforms (Netflix, Apple TV, Prime Video, HBO, Disney+, Starz) and European TV channels (NRK, ZDF, TVC). The resulting list is presented in Tables 1 and 2, categorized into productions with and without homosexual characters.
Table 1. TV Series with LGBTQI+ Characters
Title |
Platform/TV channel |
Years broadcast |
Seasons |
Format |
Heimebane (Homeground) |
NRK-1 |
2018-19 |
2 |
Series |
The Hockey Girls |
TVC/Netflix |
2019-20 |
2 |
Series |
Ted Lasso |
Apple TV |
2020-present |
3 |
Series |
The Queen's Gambit |
Netflix |
2020 |
1 |
Mini-series |
All American: Homecoming |
HBO |
2022-24 |
3 |
Series |
A League Of Their Own |
Prime Video |
2022 |
1 |
Series |
Fifteen Love |
Prime Video |
2023 |
1 |
Series |
Source: Own elaboration
Table 2. TV Series without LGBTQI+ Characters
Title |
Platform/TV channel |
Years broadcast |
Seasons |
Format |
The English Game |
Netflix |
2020 |
1 |
Mini-series |
Spinning Out |
Netflix |
2020 |
1 |
Series |
Heels |
Starz |
2021 |
2 |
Series |
The Crew |
Netflix |
2021 |
1 |
Series |
Swagger |
Apple TV |
2021-23 |
2 |
Series |
Nattryttarna (Riding in the Darkness) |
ZDF |
2022 |
1 |
Series |
Winning Time: The Rise of the Lakers Dynasty |
HBO |
2022-23 |
2 |
Series |
The Crossover |
Disney |
2023 |
1 |
Series |
Source: Own elaboration
Approximately 15 characters from each series were studied. The analysis sheet was based on the following dependent variables: identification, description, geographic origin, family situation, work and leisure, physical characteristics, sexuality, character traits, and relationship with the sport. The variables studied included gender in terms of identification: cis-male, cis-female, transgender, other (non-binary, queer, fluid), intersex, and sexual orientation, and sexuality: homosexuality, heterosexuality, bisexuality, polysexuality, asexuality, and pansexuality.
Seven members of the Research Group conducted the analysis,3 and a pre-test was performed on 21 characters. Krippendorf's Alpha was applied to the pre-test, the codebook and coder training were reviewed, and the minimum inter-coder agreement for the variables was set at 0.6.
Qualitative Analysis: Focus Groups
Two focus group discussions, one with eight female participants and the other with eight male participants, were conducted in Barcelona on July 17 and 18, 2024, respectively. The participants were selected by a specialized company, which ensured informed consent, anonymity, and the supervision of essential ethical processes in qualitative research with individuals, following the Code of Good Research Practice (Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona. Consell de Govern, 2020) and the Ethical Code (Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona. Consell de Govern, 2023). The selection of participants based on their gender identity and sexual orientation is challenging because these are considered sensitive data by ethical codes and current legislation, to which participants and potential participants have the right not to respond. The objective was to analyze perceptions of homosexuality and compare them with the working hypotheses based on a focus group. The participants' sociodemographic characteristics are equivalent to those of the middle class. In addition to having experience watching sports fiction on television (80 %), they were from the city of Barcelona or its metropolitan area (more than 80 %) and aged between 25 and 45 years old; 62.5 % of them were Spanish, and half of the participants had a degree. The remainder had completed secondary education (31.25 %), vocational training (12.5 %), or doctoral studies (6.25 %).
The focus group approach consisted of viewing excerpts from the series analyzed, the most significant of the main theme of this research: a scene from The Hockey Girls, in which the players Lorena and Flor kiss and have an adulterous relationship; and the scene featuring Colin's disclosure of his sexuality to his teammates in Ted Lasso (Table 3).
Table 3. Clips Watched by the Focus Group
Series |
Season and |
Character(s) |
Subject |
Minutes |
Ted Lasso |
3.09 |
Colin |
Coming out |
4.09'' |
The Hockey Girls |
1.14 |
Lorena and Flor |
Kiss |
2.44'' |
Source: Own elaboration
After viewing the content, the participants were asked two types of questions: 1) about their emotional reaction (Korobkova et al., 2024), and 2) about their opinion and information (based on the semi-structured interview model; Corbetta, 2007). The subsequent analysis was performed with the help of the ATLAS.ti software package, v.23, for the correct coding and identification of content clusters.
Qualitative Analysis: Narrative Analysis of Characters
The main methodology used for the analysis was discourse analysis and the characteristics established by Pearson (2003), based on those of Bordwell (1985), especially his category of dialogue and characteristics. The social and sexual characteristics established by Alfeo (2011), also studied by Blanco-Fernández et al. (2024), were also taken into consideration. We selected the series in which homosexual characters have a leading role among the sample analyzed.
Results
Quantitative Results: Sociodemographic Characteristics
A. Gender, male: cisgender binarism (Knott-Fayle et al., 2022). Only 1.5 % of the total are transgender, non-binary, queer or gender-fluid characters, and these few cases appear in female ensemble roles. Only 0.5 % of the characters are transsexual, and there are no other types of gender representation in the sample.
B. Ethnicity: cisgender white men (Vianden & Gregg, 2017). Most of the characters in the corpus analyzed, whether male (35.6 %) or female (29.8 %), are white (65.4 %). The second-largest ethnic group in the United States, in terms of production, is those of black African descent, comprising 13.9% males and 9.6% females. Latinos are far behind, with an overall rate of 3.40 %.
C. Sexual orientation: prevailing heterosexuality and parity in homosexuality (Mulvey, 2023). In the few cases in which homosexuality is present, it is distributed almost equally between the genders (8.2 % male characters and 7.2 % female characters). The tomboy/effeminate variable only applies to female characters, with 1.4 %.
Qualitative Results: Narrative Study of Characters
The Hockey Girls
The Hockey Girls has a large percentage of homosexual protagonists. It is a series broadcast during prime-time hours for family audiences. Over the two seasons, the program presents a core of main characters (the main players) and the two coaches. All the main characters are female. The fact that Lorena (Mireia Oriol) and Flor (Asia Ortega) are lesbians and Gina (Claudia Ribera) is bisexual means that LGBTQI+ characters account for a large percentage of the total number of protagonists. Meanwhile, most of the heterosexual relationships that appear are shown to be conflicted for various reasons (Germán's infidelity; loss of Raquel's virginity (1.4)); the socio-economic differences between partners (Enric and Silvia), or age differences (Toni and Emma); and the marital crises of their parents (Santi and Nuria). The heteropessimism (Seresin, 2019) that appears to be predominant in contemporary audiovisual fiction, as opposed to a self-accepted (Alfeo, 2011) homosexuality, is prevalent among all the homosexual characters in the series.
Meanwhile, adultery (the scene used in the analysis), polyamory (Gina and Lorena, 1.7, 1.9), and amorous jealousy (Gina) are also presented in the homosexual relationships, which are completely normalized and accepted. The scenes involving conflict are occasional and anecdotal. There is a complete absence of insults, derogatory language, or exclusive acceptance of heterosexual relationships. LGBTQI+ characters are not presented in a distorted manner at any time. The series adopts an intersectional approach, entirely countering homophobic, racist, and sexist behaviors (Lopera-Mármol et al., 2023).
Gina is presented as the most alternative character—she is a feminist, independent, theoretically free of taboos (1.2, 1.4), but in practice, she is more conservative than Lorena. She cannot deal with having an open relationship or (the possibility of) Lorena cheating on her with Flor, and she ends up leaving her for this reason (1.7). There are no differences in the dialogues compared to a heterosexual couple reconciling (1.7). In its egalitarian approach between genders and sexual orientations, the series shows that neither difficulties with relationships nor promiscuity are inherent to one gender or sexual orientation. As regards sexual characterization, Gina's and Lorena's homosexuality appears to be linked to an atypical type of character who is something special (Gina's peculiar clothing, Lorena's blue hair), while Flor has no distinctive characteristics. In general, the series does not delve into great depth regarding the characters' degree of self-acceptance or their emergence and genesis, and it does not present homosexuality as the characters' exclusive trait.
Ted Lasso
Both cases of meaningful homosexual representation in Ted Lasso are limited by season three, which was presumed to be the final season (Orr, 2023) when it premiered. The inspiring and nuanced story of Colin, a gay soccer player coming out, is contrasted with an upsetting entanglement between PR consultant Keeley and an investor.
Keeley's same-sex romance main concern is the power dynamic rather than their gender or sexuality. Jack's politeness and masculine business clothes (Tropiano, 2002) make her strikingly different from Keeley's explosive ex-boyfriends. Despite the depicted acceptance of the relationship, the toxic break-up leads Keeley to reunite with her conventional male ex-partner, reinforcing the heteronormative mode (Berlant & Warner, 1998; Rutherford, 1992/2023).
Colin had to keep his private life secret for two seasons. First, the problem was limited to coming out to his best friend and teammates. "My whole life is two lives" (3.6), he confesses, describing the gap between his private and working lives as aching "to be able to kiss my fella the same way the guys kiss their girls." The character fulfils this dream in the final episode of season 3. Colin repeats a self-affirmation: "I'm a strong and capable man" whenever he feels self-conscious about being exposed (3.3). Although Isaak is initially hurt at being uninformed, he fiercely defends Colin after he is subject to a homophobic expletive from a fan (3.9), promoting a narrative of defense and advocacy of homosexuality in the series. There is an obvious difference in the team's behavior in terms of politely accepting Colin's news with a supportive "we don't care" from coach Lasso (3.9) and the preceding microhomophobic gossip about Isaak's presumable gayness. Colin's storyline is an idealized narrative of acceptance of a gay man in soccer, which is as yet unattainable for most professional athletes. His relationships with his family and his boyfriend, Michael, are not problematic—hence the focus is on coming out to his colleagues in a profession well-known for its homophobia.
Colin's narrative is treated less dramatically than Keeley's and is depicted with greater nuance, benefiting the character concerned.
A League of Their Own
This adaptation focuses on queerness and is striking due to the number of queer characters present, unlike the original film by Penny Marshall (1992), which, despite emphasizing a story of feminist empowerment, ignored any non-heteronormative aspects in the story and contained no LGBTQI+ representation.
The series focuses on the characters of Carson Shaw (Abbi Jacobson), Jo Deluca (Melanie Field), and Max Chapman (Chanté Adams). Carson is a married woman running away from her humdrum life to join the Rockford Peaches female baseball team. That is her primary motivation, but the real one is to flee from a marriage to a man fighting at the front, who is her childhood best friend more than her husband. The opportunity to play with the Peaches and above all to meet Greta Gill (D'Arcy Carden), with whom she will begin a romantic relationship, will make her life more hazardous, in which she ends up becoming who she really is: "I think you're running towards your destiny" (1.1), says Greta to Carson after she cuts her hair, reinforcing the idea of a transition in her identity. Carson herself gradually becomes aware of her escape in a process of self-acceptance (Alfeo, 2011). The arc of her relationship with Greta begins as an attraction to the freedom of action she gives off. Carson discovers that she is not alone, and that "35 % of the women's league is queer" (1.4), which helps her in her process of normalization and integration (Alfeo, 2011).
There is hardly any pejorative representation of queer characters; the only negative comments are made by characters who are in the process of accepting their identity: "I'm not like you, stop... I'm normal" (1.1); but neither is there any normalization nor social integration as a result of the display of their identity within the historical context. Jo Deluca talks to Greta about how they have been concealing ("making up") their identities in the past, and Jo expresses the wish that "maybe things are changing now" (1.5). After the raid on the queer club in the following scenes, the production highlights that people who are not sexually heteronormative are subjected to significant repression involving police violence, of which Jo is a victim. Deluca's character embodies the problematic representation of queerness and the punishment they receive for celebrating it, as she is one of the characters who makes little effort to disguise her identity and clearly ignores the codes of behavior of the charm school organized by the AAG-PBL ("no pants in public", 1.1)—codes designed to promote the femininity of the players on and off the field. Like Jess McCready and Lupe Garcia, Jo always wears trousers, spits, talks with a cigarette in the corner of her mouth, drinks, and has uncanny hygiene standards; this is a far cry from the make-up they have to wear, along with the powdered pink outfit with a skirt that the players repeatedly complain about. These three characters are subject to the sexist characterization of lesbian women, as they are depicted with traditionally heteronormative masculine traits, incurring the recurring motif of the tomboy (Bailey et al., 2002).
The series also portrays the construction of Max Chapman's identity, a lesbian woman who seeks inclusion and refuses to accept her predetermined destiny. Max wants to play baseball above all else. She remains left behind not because of her gender, but because she is black. She gradually discovers that there are grey areas in this black and white society—other opportunities for her life and identity, such as the life led by her Uncle Bert (formerly Aunt Bertie), who identifies as male, and presents himself as such in society, with his wife and is presented as queer. For his freedom and activism, Uncle Bert was ostracized from the family by Max's mother, but he embodies the freedom of choice, identity, and the display thereof.
Qualitative Results: Focus Group
The nomenclature of the participants is coded according to the participant (P), random numbering, and gender (M/F). As mentioned above, the questions were divided into two categories: 1) emotional reaction to the clips, 2) opinion and information. The results of the focus group, organized according to the different content clusters obtained, are shown in Table 4:
Table 4. Synthesis of the Focus Group Content Clusters
Subject |
Male |
Female |
a. Overrepresentation of LGBTQI+ characters in TV series |
x |
x |
b. Homosexuality - Acceptance/Indifference |
x |
x |
b.1. Homosexuality - Discomfort/Rejection |
x |
|
b.2. Homosexuality - Discomfort/Rejection (Adultery) |
x |
x |
b.3. Homosexuality - Discomfort/Rejection (Wrongdoing) |
x |
|
b.4. Homosexuality and men's sports |
x |
x |
c. Stereotypes |
x |
x |
c.1. Stereotyping - Association between "female" sports and gay men |
x |
|
c.2. Stereotyping - Association between women's sports and lesbianism |
x |
x |
d. Lesbians |
x |
x |
d.2. Increased sexualization of lesbian characters |
x |
x |
Source: Compiled by the authors based on Atlas.ti (v.23)
a. Overrepresentation of LGBTQI+ characters in television series. Both the female and male focus groups believe that LGBTQI+ relationships are overrepresented in television series, and their opinions suggest that they do not believe that this representation is consistent with reality. They expressed criticism from the perspective of over-representation: "It's gratuitous in the series. And yes, you have to normalize it and whatever you like, but I don't think it's necessary," said P4-F. Concerning Heartstoppers, P1-F mentions the idea of a trend towards over-representation of LGBTQI+ characters: "They include gay characters, for example, bisexuals, lesbians, and all of that used to be unthinkable. Or non-binary genders, which is also something very new these days, and you also see it, and it's also interesting because it also exists." Only one of the female participants (P8-F) was more nuanced: "I think you see more than there really is. In other words, they need to attract your attention, and perhaps you remember this bit more."
b. Homosexuality - Acceptance/Indifference. The female participants explicitly accept homosexual characters in the series (P3-F): "I wouldn't ask anyone who you've slept with, if you're going to the Olympics." They are also accepted by the male participants (P8-M: "It seems very natural to me"), with some expressing indifference (P5-M: "Neither good nor bad").
b.1. Homosexuality - Discomfort/Rejection. The male participants were more uncomfortable than the female participants with the lesbian kissing scene, although the prevailing discourse in both groups was one of political correctness.
b.2. Homosexuality - Discomfort/Rejection (Adultery). Some of the participants (P5-M) said that what they found objectionable was adultery, whether in a heterosexual or homosexual couple.
b.3. Homosexuality - Discomfort/Rejection (Youthful wrongdoing). Several female participants (some of them mothers) said they were more concerned about youthful wrongdoing (marijuana) than sexual orientation: "It bothers me more that they are smoking (than the kiss between two girls)" (P3-F), "or that they hit the bottle" (P5-F).
b.4. Homosexuality - Male sport. There was consensus among both the male and female participants that male homosexuality is rarely associated with athletes, especially soccer players, as few "come out of the closet": "I think it's rare to see a man, a soccer player, say look, I'm gay. There must be a lot of them." (P4-F). P1-M: "In soccer, it's like a taboo. Not in other sports, there's no problem if someone's a homosexual, but in soccer... " And P3-M: "He was like a leper" (about a homosexual soccer player).
Only P7-M and P3-M offered any nuances, saying that the subject is "a thing of the past." P7-M: "Cristiano wouldn't have sold any shirts"); and that many people in Spain disclose their homosexuality when their sports career has come to an end (P3-M).
c. Stereotypes. Both male and female participants reiterated stereotypes prevalent in society. Among those referring to male homosexuality, P7-M was somewhat critical ("As far as I can remember, soccer players have always been extremely macho. Grass doesn't grow where they've walked. But that hasn't really been the case"); while the female participant seems to be complicit in some stereotypes: "There's the homosexual man, who's a 'drama queen' (dramatic), he cries and helps you, and he's like just another friend, and there's the straight man, who's an alpha male, who can handle anything, I'll help you, don't worry" (P3-F).
c.1. Stereotyping - Association between "female" sports and gay men. The women in particular stressed that some sports or professions are associated with homosexuality, reiterating the stereotype: "You watch figure skating and you see some men who say 'he's gay'" (P3-F). The cliché of effeminate homosexual male characters is perpetuated, according to P3-F: "Those who work in jobs that have traditionally been female, like in fashion or as secretaries, tend to be gay more than masculine men. [...] And there are some men who, for whatever reason, can be secretaries without being (homosexual)." P5-F: "He's a gay man who's a bit flamboyant, he's a bit comical with the feathers."
c. 2. Stereotyping - Association between women's sports and lesbianism. The link between lesbianism and women's sports was mentioned by both women (P3-F and P6-F: "You assume that the vast majority are lesbians") and men (P3-M: "When it's a female team, you always have to include a couple..." and P5-M: "Women who play soccer (seem to have to be) butch").
d. 1. Representation of lesbians compared to gay men. The representation of lesbians in television fiction was one of the most hotly debated topics: Most of the men felt they were overrepresented, as did one of the female participants (P4-F). According to P3-M:
There is a problem here that usually tends to apply to women's sports. I don't know why they always have to shoehorn a lesbian or two into the team. And yet, when you look at men's sports, it's... Very few male players have come out [...] they may sometimes be able to tell their teammates about it, but often they can't.
In the same vein, P4-F says:
I'm not uncomfortable with the series (The Hockey Girls) itself, but with the series I watch and what I see. It seems like all the women are lesbians or bisexual these days. It doesn't bother me, but I think it's exaggerated. They want to occupy the space, which men and women are obviously entitled to.
Meanwhile, the women generally agreed that lesbians are underrepresented: "Gay men are represented more than gay women" (P3-F). In the same vein, P6-F says:
I don't think it's out of proportion. What is striking is that, obviously, if there is a homosexual partner, it's a man. Gay homosexual men are more represented than gay women. And I don't know what the percentages are, but I imagine it must be more or less the same as normal life. And it seems that in fiction, gay men are more visible than lesbian women.
d.2. Increased sexualization of lesbian characters. Although all the participants agree that there are also sexualized male homosexual characters in some series like Merlí (Lozano, 2015), they reiterate their opinion that "women are always more sexualized" (P3-F). They all agree that the on-screen sexualization of sexual relations is enhanced when the characters involved are two women. According to P5-M: "I also don't know if perhaps a scene between lesbian women is more sexualized than a scene between two men," thereby perpetuating the representational stereotype mentioned above concerning the sexualization of gay female or hot lesbian characters, subjected to a male perspective in their representation.
Conclusions
Our primary hypothesis of false overrepresentation is confirmed, with a representation of LGBTQI+ characters of1.5 %, creating a false increase in visibility. Representational stereotypes are confirmed: Women are represented as tomboys in 1.4 % of the study, more than men as effeminate (0 %). The idea that an emphasis and protagonism of LGBTQI+ characters is not significant in sports-themed fiction is confirmed. The female and male characters are mostly white and heterosexual. There is barely any representation of the non-cisgender spectrum.
Narrative analysis confirms a positive treatment of homosexual characters, showing self-acceptance and normalization. There is a notable absence of earlier trends such as the destruction of gay characters (bury your gays/dead lesbian syndrome).
The qualitative results (from focus groups) indicate that the audience's perception in the sample studied is inconsistent with the quantitative findings. They believe that there is an overrepresentation of LGBTQI+ people in the series they saw. This also runs contrary to the postulates of gender studies, presenting a difference from society. An association between certain sports and certain gender stereotypes is also inferred, confirming Messner's (2002) assertions.
The same TV shows have been analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively, and it has been observed that the audience perceives an overrepresentation of homosexual characters, in contradiction with the quantitative results of this study and with gender studies. A gap appears to exist between gender studies and audience perception, which warrants further study due to its social and academic implications. This study is based on a limited corpus of contemporary sports series, which may limit the generalizability of the findings and could be expanded upon in future research.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Yago Ramis, Dr. Marta Borrueco, and Rogmary Sánchez — members of the Gendered Sports Fiction project led by Dr. Anna Tous — for their collaboration, and Rogmary for her help with the focus group.
Funding
This paper was financed by the Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), linked to the project "Gender Equality in Sports-Themed Audiovisual Fiction. Insight into Stereotypes and Psychological Dimensions. Women, Men, and LGBTQ Groups Representation (Gendered-Sports-Fiction)," with grant number PPC2023_574367.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no financial or personal conflicts of interest that could have influenced the results or interpretation of this work.
Ethics Statement
Throughout the application of the methodology and conduct of the research, strict ethical standards were maintained at all times, and participants were provided with the necessary information regarding the ethical approval of the study.
Data Availability Statement
The authors will provide access to the information and data supporting the study's findings, as well as the images used in the article, to interested parties who contact them via email, with the aim of promoting transparency and reproducibility.
Consent for Publication
It is declared that consent was obtained for the publication of personal information or identifiable images included in the course of this study.
AI Disclosure
No artificial intelligence was used in the writing or analysis of this manuscript.
Notes
1 The selection of the term LGBTQI+ over other variants such as LGBT, LGBTI, or LGBTQNAP+ is due to criteria of inclusivity, clarity, and recognition of identity dynamism. This acronym maintains an accessible and widely recognized structure, making it easy to understand in different contexts. The addition of the letter Q which represents queer identities and/or people who question their gender orientation or identity, broadens inclusivity without over-extending the term. In addition, the + sign reinforces openness to other identities not explicitly mentioned, such as non-binary, asexual, and pansexual people, without making the acronym too complex. The use of LGBTQI+ is supported by its wide acceptance by international bodies, academic studies, and human rights legislation. Unlike more expansive terms such as LGBTQNAP+, which can be confusing, this acronym strikes a balance between inclusivi-ty and clarity, encouraging the appropriation of the term in a variety of settings. Its adoption also contributes to discursive coherence and more effective representation of gender diversity in public and academic debates.
2 The Third Golden Age of Television began in the 1990s. It was marked by high-quality productions, complex narratives, and greater creative freedom, driven by streaming platforms and premium cable networks.
3 Yago Ramis, Marta Borrueco and Rogmary García, as well as the authors of this paper.
References
Alfeo, J. C. (2011). Análisis narratológico y sociedad representada: los personajes LGBT en el cine. In Narrativas audiovisuales: los discursos(pp. 63-84). Icono 14.
Annati, A., & Ramsey, L. R. (2022). Lesbian perceptions of stereotypical and sexualized media portrayals. Sexuality & Culture: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 26(1), 312-338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09892-z
Azemar, L., Anglada, O., Boadas, N., & Vivet, M. (Creators). (2019-2020). Les de l'hoquei [TV series]. Brutal Media; Televisió de Catalunya; Netflix.
Aznar Orbea, M. (2020). Cómo quieres que sea. Universidad de Sevilla. https://doi.org/10.12795/9788447222001
Bachmann, C. L., & Gooch, B. (2018). LGBT in Britain: Home and Communities. Stonewall.
Bandura, A. (2011). Social cognitive theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of social psychological theories (pp. 349-373). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n18
Bailey, J. M., Bechtold, K. T., & Berenbaum, S. A. (2002). Who are tomboys and why should we study them? Archives of sexual behavior, 31, 333-341. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016272209463
BBC News Mundo (2023, February 13). Jakub Jankto se convierte en el primer futbolista internacional en declararse gay. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-64632471
Beare, A. H., & Boucaut, R. (2024). Positive masculinity or toxic positivity? Apple TV+'s Ted Lasso as a capitalist utopia. Critical Studies in Television. https://doi.org/10.1177/17496020241228162
Berlant, L., & Warner, M. (1998). Sex in Public. Critical Inquiry, 24(2), 547-566. https://doi.org/10.1086/448884
Blanco-Fernández, V., Villegas-Simón, I., & Soto-Sanfiel, M. T. (2024). 'I Am they.' Non-Binary Representation in Television Fiction as a Manifestation of Social Conceptions. Journal of Homosexuality, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2024.2302424
Bordwell, D., Thompson, K., & Staiger, J. (Eds.). (1985). The Classical Hollywood Cinema. Columbia University.
Bowleg, L. (2008). When Black+ lesbian+ woman;* Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex roles, 59, 312-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9400-z
Chambers, S. A. (2009). Queer Politics of Television. I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755696864
Collier, N. R., Lumadue, C. A., & Wooten, H. R. (2009). Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Xena: Warrior Princess: Reception of the texts by a sample of lesbian fans and web site users. Journal of Homosexuality, 56(5), 575-609. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918360903005253
Corbetta, P. (2007). Metodología y técnicas de investigación. McGrawHill.
De la Cretaz, F. (2022). Behind the lesbian culture in women's sports — and why it matters. The Washington Post. https://www.washington-post.com/lifestyle/2022/06/10/lesbian-culture-womens-sports/
Dreier, P. (2021). A Lavender League of Their Own? Voice and Visibility of Lesbian Ballplayers. NINE: A Journal of Baseball History and Culture, 30(1), 230-250. https://doi.org/10.1353/nin.2021.0019
Fiske, J. (1987/2011). Television culture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203837153
Gergen, K. J. (2009). An invitation to social construction. Sage Publications.
Gillespie, E. (2021, October 27). Adelaide United midfielder Josh Cavallo becomes first current A-League Men player to publicly announce he's gay. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-10-27/adelaide-united-josh-cavallo-publicly-announces-hes-gay/100572664
GLAAD. (2023). Where We Are on TV Report. https://www.glaad.org/whereweareontv23
González de Garay, B., Marcos-Ramos, M., & Angulo-Brunet, A. (2023). LGBT+ characters in original Spanish video-on-demand series. Sexuality & Culture, 27(3), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-022-10038-y
González de Garay, B., & Álvarez,J. C. A. (2017). Formas de representación de la homosexualidad en el cine y la televisión españoles durante el franquismo. L’Atalante. Revista de estudios cinematográficos, 73-80. https://revistaatalante.com/index.php/atalante/article/view/386
Graham, W., & Jacobson, A. (Creators). (2022). A League of Their Own [TV series]. Amazon Studios; Sony Pictures Television; Field Trip Productions.
Guerrero-Pico, M., Estables, M. J., & Ventura, R. (2017). La Síndrome de la Lesbiana Morta: mecanismes d'autoregulació del "fandom" LGBTI en les polemiques fan-productor de la sèrie "The 100." Anàlisi: quaderns de comunicació i cultura, (57), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/analisi.3110
Heredia Leal, D. (2021). La espiral del silencio de la homofobia en el mundo del fútbol masculino. El tratamiento mediático de la homosexualidad en el deporte rey. Universidad de Sevilla. https://idus.us.es/handle/11441/126423
Herz, M., & Johansson, T. (2015). The Normativity of the Concept of Heteronormativity. Journal of Homosexuality, 62(8), 1009-1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2015.1021631
Higueras-Ruiz, M. J. (2023). Revisión de la representación trans en la ficción televisiva española: Análisis de la serie de televisión Todo lo otro (HBO Max, 2021). Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación: Mediterranean Journal of Communication, 14(1), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.23250
Knott-Fayle, G., Peel, E., & Witcomb, G. L. (2022). Representing diverse genders in sports media: The discursive production of cisgenderism in the UK press. In Gender diversity and sport (pp. 134-155).Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003050568-8
Korobkova, K., Giaccardi, S., Jauregui, S., Rosenthal, E. L., Watson-Currie, E., & Rogers, A. A. (2024). Shifting minds. Understanding the Development, Representation, and Impact of Mental Health Storylines in Entertainment. USC Norman Lear Center.
Lal, B. (1995). Symbolic interaction theories. American Behavioral Scientist, 38(3), 421-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764295038003005
Lopera-Mármol, M., Pujol, O. A., & Jiménez-Morales, M. (2023). Les de l'Hoquei/The Hockey Girls: From a Catalan Bachelor's Degree Project to Netflix. In T. Dunleavy & E. Weissmann (Eds.), TV Drama in the Multiplatform Era. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35585-1_8
Lotz, A. D. (2014). Cable guys: Television and masculinities in the 21st century. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479800582.001.0001
Lozano, H. (Creator). (2015-2018). Merlí [TV series]. Veranda TV; Televisió de Catalunya (TV3).
Madzarevic, G., & Soto, M. T. (2018). Positive Representation ofGay Characters in Movies for Reducing Homophobia. Sexuality & Culture, 22(3), 909-930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9502-x
Marcos-Ramos, M., Martín-García, T., & González-de-Garay, B. (2023). Análisis comparado de la representación de personajes LGBT+ en las series españolas de televisión generalista emitidas en prime time y originales de plataformas de streaming. Observatorio Journal, 17(1), 170-187. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS17120232083
Masanet, M. J., Ventura, R., & Balleste, E. (2022). Beyond the "Trans Fact"? Trans Representation in the Teen Series Euphoria: Complexity, Recognition, and Comfort. Social Inclusion, 10(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i2.4926
McInroy, L. B., & Craig, S. L. (2017). Perspectives of LGBTQ emerging adults on the depiction and impact of LGBTQ media representation. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1184243
Messner, M. A. (2002). Taking the Field: Women, Men, and Sports. University of Minnesota Press.
Meyer, M., & Lee, P. (2006). We All Have Feelings For Our Girlfriends: Progressive (?) Representations of Lesbian Lives on the "The L Word." Sexuality & Culture, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-010-9073-y
Miller, T. (2001). Sportsex. Temple University Press.
Mulvey, A. H. (2023). Gender and sex stereotypes in sports romance fiction [Doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University].
Orr, C. (2023, May 10). 'Ted Lasso,' Season 3, Episode 9 Recap: Colin's Moment. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/10/arts/television/ted-lasso-season-3-episode-9-recap.html
Pearson, R. E. (2003). Kings of Infinite Space: Cult Television Characters and Narrative Possibilities. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/scope/documents/2003/november-2003/pearson.pdf
Piggott, Z. (Creator). (2022-present). Heartstopper [TV series]. See-Saw Films; Netflix.
Ramírez Alvarado, M. D. M., & Cobo Durán, S. (2013). La ficción gay-friendly en las series de televisión españolas. Comunicación y sociedad, (19), 213-235. https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v0i19.209
Rutherford,J. (1992/2023). Men's silences: Predicaments in masculinity. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003373612
Sánchez Soriano, J. J. (2024). "Isn't that what you want, to be accepted?": critical analysis of LGTBIQ+ characters on television series in the United States. Doxa Comunicación, 39, 165-182. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n39a2073
Seresin, A. (2019). On heteropessimism. The New Inquiry, 9(10). https://thenewinquiry.com/on-heteropessimism/
Shugart, H. A. (2003). Reinventing Privilege: The New (Gay) Man in Contemporary Popular Media. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 20(1), 67-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/0739318032000067056
Sink, A., Mastro, D., & Dragojevic, M. (2018). Competent or warm? A stereotype content model approach to understanding perceptions of masculine and effeminate gay television characters. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(3), 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017706483
Soto-Sanfiel, M. T., & Sánchez Soriano, J. J. (2024). Absence and Distortion in the Self-Representation of LGBTQ+ Narratives. Journal of Homosexuality, 71(12), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2022.2161083
Sudeikis, J., Lawrence, B., Kelly, J., & Hunt, B. (Creators). (2020-2025). Ted Lasso [TV series]. Doozer Productions; Warner Bros. Television; Universal Television; Apple TV+.
The Sun. (1990, October 22). £1M soccer star: I am gay. Justin Fashanu confesses.
Tropiano, S. (2002). The prime time closet: A history of gays and lesbians on TV. Hal Leonard Corporation.
Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona. Consell de Govern. (2020). Code of Good Research Practice. https://ddd.uab.cat/record/148905
Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona. Consell de Govern. (2023). Ethical Code. https://www.uab.cat/doc/codi_etic
Valverde Maestre, Á. M., & Pérez Rufí, J. P. (2021). Sex Education (Netflix): Representación de adolescentes LGTBIQ+ como recurso dramático. Zer, 26(50), 16-184. https://doi.org/10.1387/zer.22528
Vianden,J., & Gregg, E. A. (2017). What's my responsibility? Undergraduate heterosexual white men in sport management discuss increasing diversity in sport. Sport Management Education Journal, 11 (2), 88-101. https://doi.org/10.1123/smej.2015-0023
Woods, N., & Hardman, D. (2021). 'It's just absolutely everywhere': understanding LGBTQ experiences of queerbaiting. Psychology & Sexuality, 13(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2021.1892808